What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Turner, Thomas F., Gold, John R.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/
http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/1/gcfi_50-62.pdf
id ftaquaticcommons:oai:generic.eprints.org:13218
record_format openpolar
spelling ftaquaticcommons:oai:generic.eprints.org:13218 2023-05-15T18:06:00+02:00 What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico Turner, Thomas F. Gold, John R. 1998 application/pdf http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/ http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/1/gcfi_50-62.pdf en eng http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/1/gcfi_50-62.pdf Turner, Thomas F. and Gold, John R. (1998) What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico. In: Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 50, pp. 1043-1052. Fisheries Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed 1998 ftaquaticcommons 2020-02-27T09:25:44Z Conference Object Red drum Sciaenops ocellatus International Association of Aquatic and Marine Science Libraries and Information Centers (IAMSLIC): Aquatic Commons
institution Open Polar
collection International Association of Aquatic and Marine Science Libraries and Information Centers (IAMSLIC): Aquatic Commons
op_collection_id ftaquaticcommons
language English
topic Fisheries
spellingShingle Fisheries
Turner, Thomas F.
Gold, John R.
What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico
topic_facet Fisheries
format Conference Object
author Turner, Thomas F.
Gold, John R.
author_facet Turner, Thomas F.
Gold, John R.
author_sort Turner, Thomas F.
title What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico
title_short What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico
title_full What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico
title_fullStr What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico
title_full_unstemmed What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico
title_sort what kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? a case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in red drum (sciaenops ocellatus) from the gulf of mexico
publishDate 1998
url http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/
http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/1/gcfi_50-62.pdf
genre Red drum
Sciaenops ocellatus
genre_facet Red drum
Sciaenops ocellatus
op_relation http://aquaticcommons.org/13218/1/gcfi_50-62.pdf
Turner, Thomas F. and Gold, John R. (1998) What kind of genetic information is best for estimating genetic effective population size? A case study of three classes of molecular markers surveyed in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) from the Gulf of Mexico. In: Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 50, pp. 1043-1052.
_version_ 1766177569851310080