Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species

Rich assemblages of tropical and subtropical planktic foraminifers from two coarsely sampled upper-Cenozoic deep-sea sequences suggest the need for changes in taxonomic method with a corresponding reclassification which includes all Cenozoic species. This is necessitated by the observation that repr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fordham, Barry
Format: Book
Language:unknown
Published: University of Chicago
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9006
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/9006/4/Fordham%2c_MiocenePleistocene1986a.pdf.jpg
id ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/9006
record_format openpolar
spelling ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/9006 2024-01-14T10:10:05+01:00 Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species Fordham, Barry 200 pages + 25 plates http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9006 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/9006/4/Fordham%2c_MiocenePleistocene1986a.pdf.jpg unknown University of Chicago Evolutionary Monographs: no. 6 Fordham, B.G. (1986). Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species. Evolutionary Monographs 6. Chicago: University of Chicago. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9006 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/9006/4/Fordham%2c_MiocenePleistocene1986a.pdf.jpg Author/s retain copyright phylogeny taxonomy planktic/planktonic foraminifera Cenozoic Book ftanucanberra 2023-12-15T09:37:31Z Rich assemblages of tropical and subtropical planktic foraminifers from two coarsely sampled upper-Cenozoic deep-sea sequences suggest the need for changes in taxonomic method with a corresponding reclassification which includes all Cenozoic species. This is necessitated by the observation that representative collections of assemblages from phylogenetic lineages exhibit unexpectedly high degrees of variation in test morphology both within assemblages and through sequences of assemblages, and so much more inclusive concepts of many species are required. Also, speciation events in many of these species lineages appear to have been preserved by the appearance of discontinuities in variation within sequences of assemblages. These observations combined with the extensive literature which documents stratigraphic distribution of infraspecific taxa are used to revise the phylogeny of late-Cenozoic species with regard to the branching sequence. This method of phylogeny reconstruction has been termed stratophenetic analysis by P.O. Gingerich. Because the common ancestry of most of these clades appears to lie in the early Cenozoic, the branching sequence is extended to the beginning of the Cenozoic based on the work of W.H. Blow. Two complementary suprageneric classifications of Cenozoic species are offered, each based on this cladogram. Both schemes refer to a revised set of generic and species taxa. The fossil species is defined cladistically: a lineage of populations existing from the splitting event of its immediate ancestor until splitting into its descendants or until terminal extinction. Degree of anagenesis associated with cladogenesis or occurring between cladogenetic events is ignored in species definition. This taxonomy results in 138 nominal Cenozoic species (four new), one for each internodal segment of the cladogram. The genus is defined phylogenetically but is neither cladistic nor, as normally applied, phylic. For primarily practical purposes the genus is used to combine species which form an ... Book Planktonic foraminifera Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
institution Open Polar
collection Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
op_collection_id ftanucanberra
language unknown
topic phylogeny
taxonomy
planktic/planktonic foraminifera
Cenozoic
spellingShingle phylogeny
taxonomy
planktic/planktonic foraminifera
Cenozoic
Fordham, Barry
Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species
topic_facet phylogeny
taxonomy
planktic/planktonic foraminifera
Cenozoic
description Rich assemblages of tropical and subtropical planktic foraminifers from two coarsely sampled upper-Cenozoic deep-sea sequences suggest the need for changes in taxonomic method with a corresponding reclassification which includes all Cenozoic species. This is necessitated by the observation that representative collections of assemblages from phylogenetic lineages exhibit unexpectedly high degrees of variation in test morphology both within assemblages and through sequences of assemblages, and so much more inclusive concepts of many species are required. Also, speciation events in many of these species lineages appear to have been preserved by the appearance of discontinuities in variation within sequences of assemblages. These observations combined with the extensive literature which documents stratigraphic distribution of infraspecific taxa are used to revise the phylogeny of late-Cenozoic species with regard to the branching sequence. This method of phylogeny reconstruction has been termed stratophenetic analysis by P.O. Gingerich. Because the common ancestry of most of these clades appears to lie in the early Cenozoic, the branching sequence is extended to the beginning of the Cenozoic based on the work of W.H. Blow. Two complementary suprageneric classifications of Cenozoic species are offered, each based on this cladogram. Both schemes refer to a revised set of generic and species taxa. The fossil species is defined cladistically: a lineage of populations existing from the splitting event of its immediate ancestor until splitting into its descendants or until terminal extinction. Degree of anagenesis associated with cladogenesis or occurring between cladogenetic events is ignored in species definition. This taxonomy results in 138 nominal Cenozoic species (four new), one for each internodal segment of the cladogram. The genus is defined phylogenetically but is neither cladistic nor, as normally applied, phylic. For primarily practical purposes the genus is used to combine species which form an ...
format Book
author Fordham, Barry
author_facet Fordham, Barry
author_sort Fordham, Barry
title Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species
title_short Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species
title_full Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species
title_fullStr Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species
title_full_unstemmed Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species
title_sort miocene–pleistocene planktic foraminifers from d. s. d. p. sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of cenozoic species
publisher University of Chicago
url http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9006
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/9006/4/Fordham%2c_MiocenePleistocene1986a.pdf.jpg
genre Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet Planktonic foraminifera
op_relation Evolutionary Monographs: no. 6
Fordham, B.G. (1986). Miocene–Pleistocene planktic foraminifers from D. S. D. P. Sites 208 and 77, and phylogeny and classification of Cenozoic species. Evolutionary Monographs 6. Chicago: University of Chicago.
http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9006
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/9006/4/Fordham%2c_MiocenePleistocene1986a.pdf.jpg
op_rights Author/s retain copyright
_version_ 1788064709442797568