Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA

A non-North American provenance for the lower Belt Supergroup of North America has been used to support various pre-Rodinian paleogeographic reconstructions. Unlike the lower Belt Supergroup, most upper Belt Supergroup provenance studies have inferred Laurentian sediment sources. We test this hypoth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geology
Main Authors: Stewart, Eric D., Link, Paul K., Fanning, Christopher, Frost, Carol D., McCurry, Michael
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Geological Society of America Inc
Subjects:
USA
Un
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1885/56503
https://doi.org/10.1130/G31194.1
id ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/56503
record_format openpolar
spelling ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/56503 2024-01-14T10:00:03+01:00 Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA Stewart, Eric D. Link, Paul K. Fanning, Christopher Frost, Carol D. McCurry, Michael http://hdl.handle.net/1885/56503 https://doi.org/10.1130/G31194.1 unknown Geological Society of America Inc 0091-7613 http://hdl.handle.net/1885/56503 doi:10.1130/G31194.1 Geology Keywords: Detrital zircon East antarctica Hf isotope Isotopic analysis Isotopic characteristics Laurentian Minor components Montana USA Nd isotopes North American Okhotsk Paleogeographic reconstruction Provenance studies Sediment sources SIBERIA Un Journal article ftanucanberra https://doi.org/10.1130/G31194.1 2023-12-15T09:34:28Z A non-North American provenance for the lower Belt Supergroup of North America has been used to support various pre-Rodinian paleogeographic reconstructions. Unlike the lower Belt Supergroup, most upper Belt Supergroup provenance studies have inferred Laurentian sediment sources. We test this hypothesis by analyzing U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopes on detrital zircons, and whole-rock Nd isotopes from the Missoula (upper Belt Supergroup) and Lemhi Groups, and comparing to possible Laurentian sources. Detrital zircons from 11 sandstones analyzed show dominant ages between 1680 and 1820 Ma. These zircons are predominantly magmatic in paragenesis. Belt Supergroup-aged (1400-1470 Ma) and 2400-2700 Ma populations represent minor components. Lu-Hf isotopic analyses for 1675-1780 Ma Missoula Group and Lemhi Group detrital zircons range from ∑Hf(i) +9 to -12 and +8 and -7, respectively. Belt Supergroup-aged grains from the Bonner Formation, Missoula Group, have ∑Hf(i) values between +5 and -9, exceeding coeval ranges from the Mojave and Yavapai terranes [∑Hf(i) between +5 and 0]. Whole-rock Nd isotopes from Lemhi Group argillites yield a range in ∑Nd(1400) between +1.1 and -5.9. Immature feldspathic sediment, nearly unimodal detrital zircon spectra, and dissimilar Belt Supergroup-aged zircon Hf signatures suggest that distal portions of the Yavapai and Mojave terranes intruded by A-type magmas were not the source for the Missoula and Lemhi Groups. Instead, a slightly modified Mesoproterozoic proto-SWEAT (southwestern United States and East Antarctica) model can best account for the sedimentologic and isotopic characteristics of the Missoula and Lemhi Groups. An alternative model with a source from southeastern Siberia and the Okhotsk Massif is less preferred. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica East Antarctica Siberia Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections East Antarctica Okhotsk Geology 38 10 927 930
institution Open Polar
collection Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
op_collection_id ftanucanberra
language unknown
topic Keywords: Detrital zircon
East antarctica
Hf isotope
Isotopic analysis
Isotopic characteristics
Laurentian
Minor components
Montana
USA
Nd isotopes
North American
Okhotsk
Paleogeographic reconstruction
Provenance studies
Sediment sources
SIBERIA
Un
spellingShingle Keywords: Detrital zircon
East antarctica
Hf isotope
Isotopic analysis
Isotopic characteristics
Laurentian
Minor components
Montana
USA
Nd isotopes
North American
Okhotsk
Paleogeographic reconstruction
Provenance studies
Sediment sources
SIBERIA
Un
Stewart, Eric D.
Link, Paul K.
Fanning, Christopher
Frost, Carol D.
McCurry, Michael
Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA
topic_facet Keywords: Detrital zircon
East antarctica
Hf isotope
Isotopic analysis
Isotopic characteristics
Laurentian
Minor components
Montana
USA
Nd isotopes
North American
Okhotsk
Paleogeographic reconstruction
Provenance studies
Sediment sources
SIBERIA
Un
description A non-North American provenance for the lower Belt Supergroup of North America has been used to support various pre-Rodinian paleogeographic reconstructions. Unlike the lower Belt Supergroup, most upper Belt Supergroup provenance studies have inferred Laurentian sediment sources. We test this hypothesis by analyzing U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopes on detrital zircons, and whole-rock Nd isotopes from the Missoula (upper Belt Supergroup) and Lemhi Groups, and comparing to possible Laurentian sources. Detrital zircons from 11 sandstones analyzed show dominant ages between 1680 and 1820 Ma. These zircons are predominantly magmatic in paragenesis. Belt Supergroup-aged (1400-1470 Ma) and 2400-2700 Ma populations represent minor components. Lu-Hf isotopic analyses for 1675-1780 Ma Missoula Group and Lemhi Group detrital zircons range from ∑Hf(i) +9 to -12 and +8 and -7, respectively. Belt Supergroup-aged grains from the Bonner Formation, Missoula Group, have ∑Hf(i) values between +5 and -9, exceeding coeval ranges from the Mojave and Yavapai terranes [∑Hf(i) between +5 and 0]. Whole-rock Nd isotopes from Lemhi Group argillites yield a range in ∑Nd(1400) between +1.1 and -5.9. Immature feldspathic sediment, nearly unimodal detrital zircon spectra, and dissimilar Belt Supergroup-aged zircon Hf signatures suggest that distal portions of the Yavapai and Mojave terranes intruded by A-type magmas were not the source for the Missoula and Lemhi Groups. Instead, a slightly modified Mesoproterozoic proto-SWEAT (southwestern United States and East Antarctica) model can best account for the sedimentologic and isotopic characteristics of the Missoula and Lemhi Groups. An alternative model with a source from southeastern Siberia and the Okhotsk Massif is less preferred.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stewart, Eric D.
Link, Paul K.
Fanning, Christopher
Frost, Carol D.
McCurry, Michael
author_facet Stewart, Eric D.
Link, Paul K.
Fanning, Christopher
Frost, Carol D.
McCurry, Michael
author_sort Stewart, Eric D.
title Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA
title_short Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA
title_full Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA
title_fullStr Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA
title_full_unstemmed Paleogeographic implications of non-North American sediment in the Mesoproterozoic upper Belt Supergroup and Lemhi Group, Idaho and Montana, USA
title_sort paleogeographic implications of non-north american sediment in the mesoproterozoic upper belt supergroup and lemhi group, idaho and montana, usa
publisher Geological Society of America Inc
url http://hdl.handle.net/1885/56503
https://doi.org/10.1130/G31194.1
geographic East Antarctica
Okhotsk
geographic_facet East Antarctica
Okhotsk
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Siberia
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Siberia
op_source Geology
op_relation 0091-7613
http://hdl.handle.net/1885/56503
doi:10.1130/G31194.1
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1130/G31194.1
container_title Geology
container_volume 38
container_issue 10
container_start_page 927
op_container_end_page 930
_version_ 1788063270539624448