Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia

Let me assert from the outset that contemporary politics and governance in Micronesia are influenced to a large extent by the traditional system which underlies the modern system. This traditional system has given a unique Micronesian flavour to contemporary politics and governance, albeit undemocra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haglegam, John
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Canberra, ACT: State, Society and Governance in Melanesia (SSGM) Program, The Australian National University 2011
Subjects:
Yap
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41819
https://doi.org/10.25911/5f20075e274dc
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41819/1/ssgmhagle.pdf.jpg
id ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/41819
record_format openpolar
spelling ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/41819 2024-01-14T10:08:34+01:00 Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia Haglegam, John 2011-01-05T08:24:12Z 252767 bytes 354 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41819 https://doi.org/10.25911/5f20075e274dc https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41819/1/ssgmhagle.pdf.jpg en_AU eng Canberra, ACT: State, Society and Governance in Melanesia (SSGM) Program, The Australian National University Discussion Paper (The Australian National University, State, Society and Governance in Melanesia (SSGM) Program): 1998/1 1328-7854 http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41819 doi:10.25911/5f20075e274dc https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41819/1/ssgmhagle.pdf.jpg Author/s retain copyright The permission is archived ERMS2230096 http://dpa.bellschool.anu.edu.au/ssgm-research-communication/discussion-paper-series Micronesia governance leadership foreign influence Micronesian chiefs American administration traditional leaders modern politics Yap Marshall Islands Chuuk Pohnpei Palau Working/Technical Paper 2011 ftanucanberra https://doi.org/10.25911/5f20075e274dc 2023-12-15T09:38:01Z Let me assert from the outset that contemporary politics and governance in Micronesia are influenced to a large extent by the traditional system which underlies the modern system. This traditional system has given a unique Micronesian flavour to contemporary politics and governance, albeit undemocratic in some cases. With careful nurturing through regular briefings and consultation by government leaders, the traditional chiefs can be relied upon to muster the necessary public support for policy implementation. The customary power of the traditional chiefs in Micronesia varied from culture to culture. For instance, on Kosrae the power was centralised in a very powerful ruler, while on Yap, the power of the chiefs was decentralised and subjected to elaborate checks and balances built into the customary political relationship. In Palau, the power was vested in the heads of two alliances of villages. These alliances were involved in constant fighting for domination. In Chuuk, the most powerful traditional leaders were the village chiefs. In the Marshall Islands, the most powerful leaders were the two paramount chiefs, one heading each of the two island chains—the Ratak and Ralik. Surprisingly, for low island chiefs, these two paramount chiefs had absolute power. In Pohnpei, the power of the traditional leaders was exercised by a paramount chief in each of the five kingdoms. However, the exercise of their customary power is checked by the head of a chiefly parallel line whose relationship to the paramount chief is like a father-son relationship, the paramount chief being the father. In the outer islands of Chuuk and Yap, each island had its paramount chief. In spite of the varied power of the traditional chiefs in Micronesia, almost all of them inherit their position through their mother. In Palau, the senior women in the chiefly clan select the paramount chief. Yap is the exception to this general rule. Both the age of the mother and her son were important determining factors for the leadership position in all ... Report Low Island Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
institution Open Polar
collection Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
op_collection_id ftanucanberra
language English
topic Micronesia
governance
leadership
foreign influence
Micronesian chiefs
American administration
traditional leaders
modern politics
Yap
Marshall Islands
Chuuk
Pohnpei
Palau
spellingShingle Micronesia
governance
leadership
foreign influence
Micronesian chiefs
American administration
traditional leaders
modern politics
Yap
Marshall Islands
Chuuk
Pohnpei
Palau
Haglegam, John
Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia
topic_facet Micronesia
governance
leadership
foreign influence
Micronesian chiefs
American administration
traditional leaders
modern politics
Yap
Marshall Islands
Chuuk
Pohnpei
Palau
description Let me assert from the outset that contemporary politics and governance in Micronesia are influenced to a large extent by the traditional system which underlies the modern system. This traditional system has given a unique Micronesian flavour to contemporary politics and governance, albeit undemocratic in some cases. With careful nurturing through regular briefings and consultation by government leaders, the traditional chiefs can be relied upon to muster the necessary public support for policy implementation. The customary power of the traditional chiefs in Micronesia varied from culture to culture. For instance, on Kosrae the power was centralised in a very powerful ruler, while on Yap, the power of the chiefs was decentralised and subjected to elaborate checks and balances built into the customary political relationship. In Palau, the power was vested in the heads of two alliances of villages. These alliances were involved in constant fighting for domination. In Chuuk, the most powerful traditional leaders were the village chiefs. In the Marshall Islands, the most powerful leaders were the two paramount chiefs, one heading each of the two island chains—the Ratak and Ralik. Surprisingly, for low island chiefs, these two paramount chiefs had absolute power. In Pohnpei, the power of the traditional leaders was exercised by a paramount chief in each of the five kingdoms. However, the exercise of their customary power is checked by the head of a chiefly parallel line whose relationship to the paramount chief is like a father-son relationship, the paramount chief being the father. In the outer islands of Chuuk and Yap, each island had its paramount chief. In spite of the varied power of the traditional chiefs in Micronesia, almost all of them inherit their position through their mother. In Palau, the senior women in the chiefly clan select the paramount chief. Yap is the exception to this general rule. Both the age of the mother and her son were important determining factors for the leadership position in all ...
format Report
author Haglegam, John
author_facet Haglegam, John
author_sort Haglegam, John
title Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia
title_short Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia
title_full Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia
title_fullStr Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia
title_full_unstemmed Traditional leaders and governance in Micronesia
title_sort traditional leaders and governance in micronesia
publisher Canberra, ACT: State, Society and Governance in Melanesia (SSGM) Program, The Australian National University
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41819
https://doi.org/10.25911/5f20075e274dc
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41819/1/ssgmhagle.pdf.jpg
genre Low Island
genre_facet Low Island
op_source http://dpa.bellschool.anu.edu.au/ssgm-research-communication/discussion-paper-series
op_relation Discussion Paper (The Australian National University, State, Society and Governance in Melanesia (SSGM) Program): 1998/1
1328-7854
http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41819
doi:10.25911/5f20075e274dc
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41819/1/ssgmhagle.pdf.jpg
op_rights Author/s retain copyright
The permission is archived ERMS2230096
op_doi https://doi.org/10.25911/5f20075e274dc
_version_ 1788062972830023680