30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented

This paper outlines concerns with the 2018 Deloitte Access Economics review of the implementation of the 339 recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). Here, we update a statement produced by Jordan et al in December 2018, which argued that due to its scope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony, Thalia, Jordan, Kirrily, Walsh, Tamara, Markham, Francis, Williams, Megan
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Canberra, ACT : Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1885/229826
https://doi.org/10.25911/22AJ-0608
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/229826/4/WP_140_Anthony_et_al_2021.pdf.jpg
id ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/229826
record_format openpolar
spelling ftanucanberra:oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/229826 2024-01-14T10:06:51+01:00 30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented Anthony, Thalia Jordan, Kirrily Walsh, Tamara Markham, Francis Williams, Megan application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1885/229826 https://doi.org/10.25911/22AJ-0608 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/229826/4/WP_140_Anthony_et_al_2021.pdf.jpg en_AU eng Canberra, ACT : Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University Working Paper (Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University); No. 140/2021 1442-3871 http://hdl.handle.net/1885/229826 doi:10.25911/22AJ-0608 https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/229826/4/WP_140_Anthony_et_al_2021.pdf.jpg Author/s retain copyright Working/Technical Paper ftanucanberra https://doi.org/10.25911/22AJ-0608 2023-12-15T09:33:33Z This paper outlines concerns with the 2018 Deloitte Access Economics review of the implementation of the 339 recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). Here, we update a statement produced by Jordan et al in December 2018, which argued that due to its scope and methodology, the Deloitte review had the potential to misrepresent the extent to which the RCIADIC recommendations had been implemented. Drawing on coronial inquest reports, we cite new evidence of the failure of governments to implement key RCIADIC recommendations and the fatal consequences for First Nations lives. We argue that there is a risk that misinformation may influence policy and practice responses to First Nations deaths in custody, and opportunities to address the widespread problems in Indigenous public policy in Australia may be missed. In particular, current approaches too often ignore the principles of self-determination and the realities of laws and policies as experienced by First Nations peoples. We reiterate arguments for the development of national independent monitoring of Indigenous deaths in custody and further work towards the implementation of the recommendations of RCIADIC. We also call on the Australian Government to provide a response to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s 2017 Inquiry on Indigenous Incarceration Rates. Report First Nations Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
institution Open Polar
collection Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
op_collection_id ftanucanberra
language English
description This paper outlines concerns with the 2018 Deloitte Access Economics review of the implementation of the 339 recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). Here, we update a statement produced by Jordan et al in December 2018, which argued that due to its scope and methodology, the Deloitte review had the potential to misrepresent the extent to which the RCIADIC recommendations had been implemented. Drawing on coronial inquest reports, we cite new evidence of the failure of governments to implement key RCIADIC recommendations and the fatal consequences for First Nations lives. We argue that there is a risk that misinformation may influence policy and practice responses to First Nations deaths in custody, and opportunities to address the widespread problems in Indigenous public policy in Australia may be missed. In particular, current approaches too often ignore the principles of self-determination and the realities of laws and policies as experienced by First Nations peoples. We reiterate arguments for the development of national independent monitoring of Indigenous deaths in custody and further work towards the implementation of the recommendations of RCIADIC. We also call on the Australian Government to provide a response to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s 2017 Inquiry on Indigenous Incarceration Rates.
format Report
author Anthony, Thalia
Jordan, Kirrily
Walsh, Tamara
Markham, Francis
Williams, Megan
spellingShingle Anthony, Thalia
Jordan, Kirrily
Walsh, Tamara
Markham, Francis
Williams, Megan
30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented
author_facet Anthony, Thalia
Jordan, Kirrily
Walsh, Tamara
Markham, Francis
Williams, Megan
author_sort Anthony, Thalia
title 30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented
title_short 30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented
title_full 30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented
title_fullStr 30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented
title_full_unstemmed 30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented
title_sort 30 years on: royal commission into aboriginal deaths in custody recommendations remain unimplemented
publisher Canberra, ACT : Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University
url http://hdl.handle.net/1885/229826
https://doi.org/10.25911/22AJ-0608
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/229826/4/WP_140_Anthony_et_al_2021.pdf.jpg
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation Working Paper (Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University); No. 140/2021
1442-3871
http://hdl.handle.net/1885/229826
doi:10.25911/22AJ-0608
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/229826/4/WP_140_Anthony_et_al_2021.pdf.jpg
op_rights Author/s retain copyright
op_doi https://doi.org/10.25911/22AJ-0608
_version_ 1788061275780022272