Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges

Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy is used to detect variations in the strength of Earth's ancient magnetic field. Paleointensity studies have demonstrated that a dominantly dipolar geomagnetic signal can be recorded in a globally coherent manner in different types of sediments and in non-sed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberts, Andrew, Tauxe, Lisa, Heslop, David
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Pergamon-Elsevier Ltd 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1885/84570
id ftanucanberra:oai:digitalcollections.anu.edu.au:1885/84570
record_format openpolar
spelling ftanucanberra:oai:digitalcollections.anu.edu.au:1885/84570 2023-05-15T16:39:11+02:00 Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges Roberts, Andrew Tauxe, Lisa Heslop, David 2015-12-13T23:01:45Z http://hdl.handle.net/1885/84570 unknown Pergamon-Elsevier Ltd 0277-3791 http://hdl.handle.net/1885/84570 Quaternary Science Reviews Journal article 2015 ftanucanberra 2015-12-28T23:38:37Z Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy is used to detect variations in the strength of Earth's ancient magnetic field. Paleointensity studies have demonstrated that a dominantly dipolar geomagnetic signal can be recorded in a globally coherent manner in different types of sediments and in non-sedimentary archives, including ice core records and marine magnetic anomaly profiles. The dominantly dipolar nature of geomagnetic paleointensity variations provides a global geophysical signal that has come to be widely used to date Quaternary sediments. Despite the many successful applications of paleointensity-assisted chronology, the mechanisms by which sediments become magnetized remain poorly understood and there is no satisfactory theoretical foundation for paleointensity estimation. In this paper, we outline past successes of sedimentary paleointensity analysis as well as remaining challenges that need to be addressed to place such work on a more secure theoretical and empirical foundation. We illustrate how common concepts for explaining sedimentary remanence acquisition can give rise to centennial to millennial offsets between paleomagnetic and other signals, which is a key limitation for using paleointensity signals for geochronology. Our approach is intended to help non-specialists to better understand the legitimate uses and limitations of paleointensity stratigraphy, while pointing to outstanding problems that require concerted specialist efforts to resolve. Article in Journal/Newspaper ice core Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
institution Open Polar
collection Australian National University: ANU Digital Collections
op_collection_id ftanucanberra
language unknown
description Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy is used to detect variations in the strength of Earth's ancient magnetic field. Paleointensity studies have demonstrated that a dominantly dipolar geomagnetic signal can be recorded in a globally coherent manner in different types of sediments and in non-sedimentary archives, including ice core records and marine magnetic anomaly profiles. The dominantly dipolar nature of geomagnetic paleointensity variations provides a global geophysical signal that has come to be widely used to date Quaternary sediments. Despite the many successful applications of paleointensity-assisted chronology, the mechanisms by which sediments become magnetized remain poorly understood and there is no satisfactory theoretical foundation for paleointensity estimation. In this paper, we outline past successes of sedimentary paleointensity analysis as well as remaining challenges that need to be addressed to place such work on a more secure theoretical and empirical foundation. We illustrate how common concepts for explaining sedimentary remanence acquisition can give rise to centennial to millennial offsets between paleomagnetic and other signals, which is a key limitation for using paleointensity signals for geochronology. Our approach is intended to help non-specialists to better understand the legitimate uses and limitations of paleointensity stratigraphy, while pointing to outstanding problems that require concerted specialist efforts to resolve.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Roberts, Andrew
Tauxe, Lisa
Heslop, David
spellingShingle Roberts, Andrew
Tauxe, Lisa
Heslop, David
Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges
author_facet Roberts, Andrew
Tauxe, Lisa
Heslop, David
author_sort Roberts, Andrew
title Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges
title_short Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges
title_full Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges
title_fullStr Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: Successes and future challenges
title_sort magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution quaternary geochronology: successes and future challenges
publisher Pergamon-Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/1885/84570
genre ice core
genre_facet ice core
op_source Quaternary Science Reviews
op_relation 0277-3791
http://hdl.handle.net/1885/84570
_version_ 1766029521782308864