Lifelong learning in Europe
In this study, we examined the status of the European Union and Turkey on the basis of the variables within the scope of Lifelong Learning. We used the k-means cluster analysis and the discriminant analysis, which are multivariate statistical techniques, in our study. When we separated our dataset i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sakarya University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/11421/11439 |
id |
ftanadoluuniv:oai:earsiv.anadolu.edu.tr:11421/11439 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftanadoluuniv:oai:earsiv.anadolu.edu.tr:11421/11439 2023-05-15T16:48:36+02:00 Lifelong learning in Europe Berberoğlu, Bahar Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Berberoğlu, Bahar 2016 https://hdl.handle.net/11421/11439 eng eng Sakarya University Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı 1303-6521 https://hdl.handle.net/11421/11439 2016 DecemberSpecialIssue 61 68 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess article 2016 ftanadoluuniv 2020-10-21T11:16:49Z In this study, we examined the status of the European Union and Turkey on the basis of the variables within the scope of Lifelong Learning. We used the k-means cluster analysis and the discriminant analysis, which are multivariate statistical techniques, in our study. When we separated our dataset into 4 clusters, we found our success of correct clustering as 97.0%. We saw in our analysis that Denmark, the Netherlands, Iceland and Switzerland had the best positions and constituted the top cluster. While the second best cluster contained countries such as Germany, France, Sweden and Norway, Turkey ranked in the cluster right above the lowest one together with 9 European Countries. The lowest cluster was comprised by 12 European countries Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Anadolu University Institutional Repository Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Anadolu University Institutional Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftanadoluuniv |
language |
English |
description |
In this study, we examined the status of the European Union and Turkey on the basis of the variables within the scope of Lifelong Learning. We used the k-means cluster analysis and the discriminant analysis, which are multivariate statistical techniques, in our study. When we separated our dataset into 4 clusters, we found our success of correct clustering as 97.0%. We saw in our analysis that Denmark, the Netherlands, Iceland and Switzerland had the best positions and constituted the top cluster. While the second best cluster contained countries such as Germany, France, Sweden and Norway, Turkey ranked in the cluster right above the lowest one together with 9 European Countries. The lowest cluster was comprised by 12 European countries |
author2 |
Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Berberoğlu, Bahar |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Berberoğlu, Bahar |
spellingShingle |
Berberoğlu, Bahar Lifelong learning in Europe |
author_facet |
Berberoğlu, Bahar |
author_sort |
Berberoğlu, Bahar |
title |
Lifelong learning in Europe |
title_short |
Lifelong learning in Europe |
title_full |
Lifelong learning in Europe |
title_fullStr |
Lifelong learning in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lifelong learning in Europe |
title_sort |
lifelong learning in europe |
publisher |
Sakarya University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11421/11439 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı 1303-6521 https://hdl.handle.net/11421/11439 2016 DecemberSpecialIssue 61 68 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
_version_ |
1766038683908046848 |