A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.
Publication history: Accepted - 7 June 2022; Published online - 15 June 2022 An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod-caugh...
Published in: | Journal of Fish Biology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 |
id |
ftafbinst:oai:afbi.dspacedirect.org:20.500.12518/477 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftafbinst:oai:afbi.dspacedirect.org:20.500.12518/477 2024-09-09T20:05:55+00:00 A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert S. Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle M. Del Villar-Guerra, diego Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems 2022-06-15 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 en eng Wiley http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477 Kennedy, R., Rosell, R., Campbell, W., Allen, M. and Del Villar‐Guerra, D. (2022) ‘A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs . trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts’, Journal of Fish Biology. Wiley. doi:10.1111/jfb.15134. 0022-1112 1095-8649 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 Copyright 2022 Fisheries Society of the British Isles. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. Rod catch Salmonids Smolt Telemetry Article 2022 ftafbinst https://doi.org/20.500.12518/47710.1111/jfb.15134 2024-06-16T23:31:00Z Publication history: Accepted - 7 June 2022; Published online - 15 June 2022 An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod-caught fish captured using a sensitive angling technique. No significant difference was evident in survival with 83% of both samples detected in the river outflow, 67% of the trap and 76% of the rod samples were detected in coastal waters and finally 43% of the trap and 35% of the rod samples were detected on an offshore array c. 50 km from the river outlet. No significant difference was evident in the time taken for trap- and rod-sampled fish to reach either the river outflow, coastal or offshore waters. Angling, if undertaken sensitively, can provide an effective, resource-efficient and ethically justifiable sampling tool for juvenile salmonid age classes. This work was funded by Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs for N. Ireland and by the Seamonitor project (EU INTERREG VA Programme). Article in Journal/Newspaper Salmo salar AFBI Repository (Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute) Journal of Fish Biology 101 3 745 748 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
AFBI Repository (Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute) |
op_collection_id |
ftafbinst |
language |
English |
topic |
Rod catch Salmonids Smolt Telemetry |
spellingShingle |
Rod catch Salmonids Smolt Telemetry Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert S. Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle M. Del Villar-Guerra, diego A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. |
topic_facet |
Rod catch Salmonids Smolt Telemetry |
description |
Publication history: Accepted - 7 June 2022; Published online - 15 June 2022 An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod-caught fish captured using a sensitive angling technique. No significant difference was evident in survival with 83% of both samples detected in the river outflow, 67% of the trap and 76% of the rod samples were detected in coastal waters and finally 43% of the trap and 35% of the rod samples were detected on an offshore array c. 50 km from the river outlet. No significant difference was evident in the time taken for trap- and rod-sampled fish to reach either the river outflow, coastal or offshore waters. Angling, if undertaken sensitively, can provide an effective, resource-efficient and ethically justifiable sampling tool for juvenile salmonid age classes. This work was funded by Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs for N. Ireland and by the Seamonitor project (EU INTERREG VA Programme). |
author2 |
Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert S. Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle M. Del Villar-Guerra, diego |
author_facet |
Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert S. Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle M. Del Villar-Guerra, diego |
author_sort |
Kennedy, Richard |
title |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. |
title_short |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. |
title_full |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. |
title_sort |
comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled s. salar smolts. |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 |
genre |
Salmo salar |
genre_facet |
Salmo salar |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477 Kennedy, R., Rosell, R., Campbell, W., Allen, M. and Del Villar‐Guerra, D. (2022) ‘A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs . trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts’, Journal of Fish Biology. Wiley. doi:10.1111/jfb.15134. 0022-1112 1095-8649 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 |
op_rights |
Copyright 2022 Fisheries Society of the British Isles. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/20.500.12518/47710.1111/jfb.15134 |
container_title |
Journal of Fish Biology |
container_volume |
101 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
745 |
op_container_end_page |
748 |
_version_ |
1809938316037980160 |