A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.

Publication history: Accepted - 7 June 2022; Published online - 15 June 2022 An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod-caugh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Biology
Main Authors: Kennedy, Richard, Rosell, Robert S., Campbell, Warren, Allen, Michelle M., Del Villar-Guerra, diego
Other Authors: Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134
id ftafbinst:oai:afbi.dspacedirect.org:20.500.12518/477
record_format openpolar
spelling ftafbinst:oai:afbi.dspacedirect.org:20.500.12518/477 2024-09-09T20:05:55+00:00 A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts. Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert S. Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle M. Del Villar-Guerra, diego Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems 2022-06-15 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 en eng Wiley http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477 Kennedy, R., Rosell, R., Campbell, W., Allen, M. and Del Villar‐Guerra, D. (2022) ‘A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs . trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts’, Journal of Fish Biology. Wiley. doi:10.1111/jfb.15134. 0022-1112 1095-8649 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 Copyright 2022 Fisheries Society of the British Isles. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. Rod catch Salmonids Smolt Telemetry Article 2022 ftafbinst https://doi.org/20.500.12518/47710.1111/jfb.15134 2024-06-16T23:31:00Z Publication history: Accepted - 7 June 2022; Published online - 15 June 2022 An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod-caught fish captured using a sensitive angling technique. No significant difference was evident in survival with 83% of both samples detected in the river outflow, 67% of the trap and 76% of the rod samples were detected in coastal waters and finally 43% of the trap and 35% of the rod samples were detected on an offshore array c. 50 km from the river outlet. No significant difference was evident in the time taken for trap- and rod-sampled fish to reach either the river outflow, coastal or offshore waters. Angling, if undertaken sensitively, can provide an effective, resource-efficient and ethically justifiable sampling tool for juvenile salmonid age classes. This work was funded by Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs for N. Ireland and by the Seamonitor project (EU INTERREG VA Programme). Article in Journal/Newspaper Salmo salar AFBI Repository (Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute) Journal of Fish Biology 101 3 745 748
institution Open Polar
collection AFBI Repository (Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute)
op_collection_id ftafbinst
language English
topic Rod catch
Salmonids
Smolt
Telemetry
spellingShingle Rod catch
Salmonids
Smolt
Telemetry
Kennedy, Richard
Rosell, Robert S.
Campbell, Warren
Allen, Michelle M.
Del Villar-Guerra, diego
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.
topic_facet Rod catch
Salmonids
Smolt
Telemetry
description Publication history: Accepted - 7 June 2022; Published online - 15 June 2022 An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod-caught fish captured using a sensitive angling technique. No significant difference was evident in survival with 83% of both samples detected in the river outflow, 67% of the trap and 76% of the rod samples were detected in coastal waters and finally 43% of the trap and 35% of the rod samples were detected on an offshore array c. 50 km from the river outlet. No significant difference was evident in the time taken for trap- and rod-sampled fish to reach either the river outflow, coastal or offshore waters. Angling, if undertaken sensitively, can provide an effective, resource-efficient and ethically justifiable sampling tool for juvenile salmonid age classes. This work was funded by Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs for N. Ireland and by the Seamonitor project (EU INTERREG VA Programme).
author2 Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kennedy, Richard
Rosell, Robert S.
Campbell, Warren
Allen, Michelle M.
Del Villar-Guerra, diego
author_facet Kennedy, Richard
Rosell, Robert S.
Campbell, Warren
Allen, Michelle M.
Del Villar-Guerra, diego
author_sort Kennedy, Richard
title A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.
title_short A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.
title_full A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.
title_fullStr A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled S. salar smolts.
title_sort comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap-sampled s. salar smolts.
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134
genre Salmo salar
genre_facet Salmo salar
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/477
Kennedy, R., Rosell, R., Campbell, W., Allen, M. and Del Villar‐Guerra, D. (2022) ‘A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs . trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts’, Journal of Fish Biology. Wiley. doi:10.1111/jfb.15134.
0022-1112
1095-8649
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134
op_rights Copyright 2022 Fisheries Society of the British Isles. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.12518/47710.1111/jfb.15134
container_title Journal of Fish Biology
container_volume 101
container_issue 3
container_start_page 745
op_container_end_page 748
_version_ 1809938316037980160