Forecasting the northern African dust outbreak towards Europe in April 2011: a model intercomparison

• Published in: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
• Main Authors: Huneeus, Nicolas, Basart, Sara, Fiedler, Stephanie, Morcrette, ‪Jean-Jacques, Benedetti, Angela, Mulcahy, Jane, Terradellas, Enric, Pérez García-Pando, Carlos, Pejanovic, Goran, Nickovic, Slodoban, Arsenovic, Pavle, Schulz, Michael, Cuevas Agulló, Emilio, Baldasano, José María, Pey, Jorge, Remy, Samuel, Cvetkovic, Bojan
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: European Geosciences Union 2016
• Subjects: Dust storm; Intrusión de polvo; Polvo africano; Predicción meteorológica; Dust outbreak; African dust; Forecasting; Aerosol Robotic Network
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/520

In the framework of the World Meteorological Organisation's Sand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System, we evaluated the predictions of five state-of-the-art dust forecast models during an intense Saharan dust outbreak affecting Western and Northern Europe in April 2011. We assessed the capacity of the models to predict the evolution of the dust cloud with lead-times of up to 72 h using observations of aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and dust surface concentrations from a ground-based measurement network. In addition, the predicted vertical dust distribution was evaluated with vertical extinction profiles from the Cloud and Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP). To assess the diversity in forecast capability among the models, the analysis was extended to wind field (both surface and profile), synoptic conditions, emissions and deposition fluxes. Models predict the onset and evolution of the AOD for all analysed lead-times. On average, differences among the models are larger than differences among lead-times for each individual model. In spite of large differences in emission and deposition, the models present comparable skill for AOD. In general, models are better in predicting AOD than near-surface dust concentration over the Iberian Peninsula. Models tend to underestimate the long-range transport towards Northern Europe. Our analysis suggests that this is partly due to difficulties in simulating the vertical distribution dust and horizontal wind. Differences in the size distribution and wet scavenging efficiency may also account for model diversity in long-range transport. The authors acknowledge AERONET (http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov) and thank the PIs of the AERONET stations used in this paper for maintaining the observation program and the AERONET-Europe TNA (EU-ACTRIS grant no. 262254) for contributing to calibration efforts. S. Basart acknowledges the Catalan Government ...