CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness

CO2 flux-measurement in dominant tundra vegetation on the Seward Peninsula of Alaska was examined for spatial representativeness, using a manual chamber system. In order to assess the representativeness of CO2 flux, a 40 m × 40 m (5-m interval; 81 total points) plot was used in June, August, and Sep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: Arctic Data Center
Subjects:
Online Access:https://search.dataone.org/view/62a112d0-876d-41fd-b882-499a62210912
id dataone:62a112d0-876d-41fd-b882-499a62210912
record_format openpolar
spelling dataone:62a112d0-876d-41fd-b882-499a62210912 2023-11-08T14:14:57+01:00 CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness ENVELOPE(-168.0,-162.0,67.0,64.0) BEGINDATE: 2011-06-01T09:53:00Z ENDDATE: 2011-09-30T09:53:00Z 2020-12-18T23:21:13.327Z https://search.dataone.org/view/62a112d0-876d-41fd-b882-499a62210912 unknown Arctic Data Center tundra lichen moss tussock CO2 flux Seward Peninsula Dataset dataone:urn:node:ARCTIC 2023-11-08T13:46:33Z CO2 flux-measurement in dominant tundra vegetation on the Seward Peninsula of Alaska was examined for spatial representativeness, using a manual chamber system. In order to assess the representativeness of CO2 flux, a 40 m × 40 m (5-m interval; 81 total points) plot was used in June, August, and September of 2011. Average CO2 fluxes in lichen, moss, and tussock tundra were 3.4 ± 2.7, 4.5 ± 2.9, and 7.2 ± 5.7 mgCO2/m2/m during growing season, respectively, suggesting that tussock tundra is a significant CO2 source, especially considering the wide distribution of tussock tundra in the circumpolar region. Further, soil temperature, rather than soil moisture, held the key role in regulating CO2 flux at the study site: CO2 flux from tussock increased linearly as soil temperature increased, while the flux from lichen and moss followed soil temperature nearly exponentially, reflecting differences in surface area covered by the chamber system. Regarding sample size, the 81 total sampling points over June, August, and September satisfy an experimental average that falls within ±10% of full sample average, with a 95% confidence level. However, the number of sampling points for each variety of vegetation during each month must provide at least ±20%, with an 80% confidence level. In order to overcome the logistical constraints, we were required to identify the site’s characteristics with a manual chamber system over a 40 m × 40 m plot and to subsequently employ an automated chamber for spatiotemporal representativeness. Dataset Seward Peninsula Tundra Alaska Arctic Data Center (via DataONE) ENVELOPE(-168.0,-162.0,67.0,64.0)
institution Open Polar
collection Arctic Data Center (via DataONE)
op_collection_id dataone:urn:node:ARCTIC
language unknown
topic tundra
lichen
moss
tussock
CO2 flux
Seward Peninsula
spellingShingle tundra
lichen
moss
tussock
CO2 flux
Seward Peninsula
CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness
topic_facet tundra
lichen
moss
tussock
CO2 flux
Seward Peninsula
description CO2 flux-measurement in dominant tundra vegetation on the Seward Peninsula of Alaska was examined for spatial representativeness, using a manual chamber system. In order to assess the representativeness of CO2 flux, a 40 m × 40 m (5-m interval; 81 total points) plot was used in June, August, and September of 2011. Average CO2 fluxes in lichen, moss, and tussock tundra were 3.4 ± 2.7, 4.5 ± 2.9, and 7.2 ± 5.7 mgCO2/m2/m during growing season, respectively, suggesting that tussock tundra is a significant CO2 source, especially considering the wide distribution of tussock tundra in the circumpolar region. Further, soil temperature, rather than soil moisture, held the key role in regulating CO2 flux at the study site: CO2 flux from tussock increased linearly as soil temperature increased, while the flux from lichen and moss followed soil temperature nearly exponentially, reflecting differences in surface area covered by the chamber system. Regarding sample size, the 81 total sampling points over June, August, and September satisfy an experimental average that falls within ±10% of full sample average, with a 95% confidence level. However, the number of sampling points for each variety of vegetation during each month must provide at least ±20%, with an 80% confidence level. In order to overcome the logistical constraints, we were required to identify the site’s characteristics with a manual chamber system over a 40 m × 40 m plot and to subsequently employ an automated chamber for spatiotemporal representativeness.
format Dataset
title CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness
title_short CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness
title_full CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness
title_fullStr CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness
title_full_unstemmed CO2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, Council, Alaska: Assessment of spatial representativeness
title_sort co2 flux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock, council, alaska: assessment of spatial representativeness
publisher Arctic Data Center
publishDate
url https://search.dataone.org/view/62a112d0-876d-41fd-b882-499a62210912
op_coverage ENVELOPE(-168.0,-162.0,67.0,64.0)
BEGINDATE: 2011-06-01T09:53:00Z ENDDATE: 2011-09-30T09:53:00Z
long_lat ENVELOPE(-168.0,-162.0,67.0,64.0)
genre Seward Peninsula
Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Seward Peninsula
Tundra
Alaska
_version_ 1782011203855319040