Process Modeling of Aerosol-cloud Interaction in Summertime Precipitating Shallow Cumulus over the Western North Atlantic

• Main Authors: Li, Xiang-Yu, Wang, Hailong, Christensen, Matthew W., Chen, Jingyi, Tang, Shuaiqi, Kirschler, Simon, Crosbie, Ewan, Ziemba, Luke D., Painemal, David, Corral, Andrea, McCauley, Kayla Ann, Dmitrovic, Sanja, Sorooshian, Armin, Fenn, Marta A, schlosser, joseph, Stamnes, Snorre, Hair, Johnathan, Cairns, Brian, Moore, Richard H, Ferrare, Richard, Shook, Michael, Choi, Yonghoon, Diskin, Glenn S., DiGangi, Joshua Paul, Nowak, John B., Robinson, Claire E, Shingler, Taylor, Thornhill, Kenneth L, Voigt, Christiane
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: unknown
• Published: Authorea, Inc. 2023
• Subjects: North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.22541/essoar.168748394.49974536/v1

Process modeling of aerosol-cloud interaction is essential to bridging gaps between observational analysis and climate modeling of aerosol effects in the Earth system and eventually reducing climate projection uncertainties. In this study, we examine aerosol-cloud interaction in summertime precipitating shallow cumuli observed during the Aerosol Cloud meTeorology Interactions oVer the western ATlantic Experiment (ACTIVATE). Aerosols and precipitating shallow cumuli were extensively observed with in-situ and remote-sensing instruments during two research flight cases on 02 June and 07 June, respectively, during the ACTIVATE summer 2021 deployment phase. We perform observational analysis and large-eddy simulation (LES) of aerosol effect on precipitating cumulus in these two cases. Given the measured aerosol size distributions and meteorological conditions, LES is able to reproduce the observed cloud properties by aircraft such as liquid water content (LWC), cloud droplet number concentration (N) and effective radius r. However, it produces smaller liquid water path (LWP) and larger N compared to the satellite retrievals. Both 02 and 07 June cases are over warm waters of the Gulf Stream and have a cloud top height over 3 km, but the 07 June case is more polluted and has larger LWC. We find that the aerosol-induced LWP adjustment is dominated by precipitation and is anticorrelated with cloud-top entrainment for both cases. A negative cloud fraction adjustment due to an increase of aerosol number concentration is also shown in the simulations.