Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America

Land use and land cover change (LULCC) represents a key process of human-Earth system interaction and has profound impacts on ecosystem carbon cycling. As a key input for ecosystem models, future gridded LULCC data is typically spatially downscaled from regionally LULCC projections by integrated ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luo, Meng, Li, Fa, Hao, Dalei, Zhu, Qing, Dashti, Hamid, Chen, Min
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Authorea, Inc. 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898494.46719465/v1
id crwinnower:10.22541/essoar.167898494.46719465/v1
record_format openpolar
spelling crwinnower:10.22541/essoar.167898494.46719465/v1 2024-06-02T08:02:31+00:00 Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America Luo, Meng Li, Fa Hao, Dalei Zhu, Qing Dashti, Hamid Chen, Min 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898494.46719465/v1 unknown Authorea, Inc. posted-content 2023 crwinnower https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898494.46719465/v1 2024-05-07T14:19:26Z Land use and land cover change (LULCC) represents a key process of human-Earth system interaction and has profound impacts on ecosystem carbon cycling. As a key input for ecosystem models, future gridded LULCC data is typically spatially downscaled from regionally LULCC projections by integrated assessment models. The uncertainty associated with different spatial downscaling methods and its impacts on subsequent model projections have been historically ignored and rarely examined. This study investigated this problem using two representative spatial downscaling methods and focused on the impacts on the carbon cycle over ABoVE domain. Specifically, we used the Future Land Use Simulation model (FLUS) and Demeter model to generate 0.25-degree gridded LULCC data with the same input of regional LULCC projections from Global Change Analysis Model, under SSP126 and SSP585. The two sets of downscaled LULCC were used to drive CLM5 to prognostically simulate terrestrial carbon cycle dynamics over the 21st century. The results suggest large spatial-temporal differences between two LULCC datasets under both SSP126 and SSP585. The LULCC differences further lead to large discrepancies in the spatial patterns of projected carbon cycle variables, which are more than 79% of the contributions of LULCC in 2100. Besides, the difference for LULCC and carbon flux under SSP126 is generally larger than those under SSP585. This study highlights the importance of considering the uncertainties induced by spatial downscaling process in future LULCC projections and carbon cycle simulations. Other/Unknown Material Arctic The Winnower Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection The Winnower
op_collection_id crwinnower
language unknown
description Land use and land cover change (LULCC) represents a key process of human-Earth system interaction and has profound impacts on ecosystem carbon cycling. As a key input for ecosystem models, future gridded LULCC data is typically spatially downscaled from regionally LULCC projections by integrated assessment models. The uncertainty associated with different spatial downscaling methods and its impacts on subsequent model projections have been historically ignored and rarely examined. This study investigated this problem using two representative spatial downscaling methods and focused on the impacts on the carbon cycle over ABoVE domain. Specifically, we used the Future Land Use Simulation model (FLUS) and Demeter model to generate 0.25-degree gridded LULCC data with the same input of regional LULCC projections from Global Change Analysis Model, under SSP126 and SSP585. The two sets of downscaled LULCC were used to drive CLM5 to prognostically simulate terrestrial carbon cycle dynamics over the 21st century. The results suggest large spatial-temporal differences between two LULCC datasets under both SSP126 and SSP585. The LULCC differences further lead to large discrepancies in the spatial patterns of projected carbon cycle variables, which are more than 79% of the contributions of LULCC in 2100. Besides, the difference for LULCC and carbon flux under SSP126 is generally larger than those under SSP585. This study highlights the importance of considering the uncertainties induced by spatial downscaling process in future LULCC projections and carbon cycle simulations.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Luo, Meng
Li, Fa
Hao, Dalei
Zhu, Qing
Dashti, Hamid
Chen, Min
spellingShingle Luo, Meng
Li, Fa
Hao, Dalei
Zhu, Qing
Dashti, Hamid
Chen, Min
Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America
author_facet Luo, Meng
Li, Fa
Hao, Dalei
Zhu, Qing
Dashti, Hamid
Chen, Min
author_sort Luo, Meng
title Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America
title_short Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America
title_full Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America
title_fullStr Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America
title_full_unstemmed Uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the Arctic-Boreal region of North America
title_sort uncertain spatial pattern of future land use and land cover change and its impacts on terrestrial carbon cycle over the arctic-boreal region of north america
publisher Authorea, Inc.
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898494.46719465/v1
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_doi https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898494.46719465/v1
_version_ 1800747003711324160