Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation
The ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ for seasonal forecasts of the winter NAO is often described as an ‘underconfident’ forecast and measured using the ratio-of-predictable components metric (RPC). However, comparison of RPC with other measures of forecast confidence, such as spread-error ratios, can give...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Authorea, Inc.
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898485.56269215/v1 |
id |
crwinnower:10.22541/essoar.167898485.56269215/v1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwinnower:10.22541/essoar.167898485.56269215/v1 2024-06-02T08:11:24+00:00 Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation Strommen, Kristian MacRae, Molly Christensen, Hannah 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898485.56269215/v1 unknown Authorea, Inc. posted-content 2023 crwinnower https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898485.56269215/v1 2024-05-07T14:19:27Z The ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ for seasonal forecasts of the winter NAO is often described as an ‘underconfident’ forecast and measured using the ratio-of-predictable components metric (RPC). However, comparison of RPC with other measures of forecast confidence, such as spread-error ratios, can give conflicting impressions, challenging this informal description. We show, using a linear statistical model, that the ‘paradox’ is equivalent to a situation where the reliability diagram of any percentile forecast has a slope exceeding 1. The relationship with spread-error ratios is shown to be far less direct. We furthermore compute reliability diagrams of winter NAO forecasts using seasonal hindcasts from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts and the UK Meteorological Office. While these broadly exhibit slopes exceeding 1, there is evidence of asymmetry between upper and lower terciles, indicating a potential violation of linearity/Gaussianity. The limitations and benefits of reliability diagrams as a diagnostic tool are discussed. Other/Unknown Material North Atlantic The Winnower |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
The Winnower |
op_collection_id |
crwinnower |
language |
unknown |
description |
The ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ for seasonal forecasts of the winter NAO is often described as an ‘underconfident’ forecast and measured using the ratio-of-predictable components metric (RPC). However, comparison of RPC with other measures of forecast confidence, such as spread-error ratios, can give conflicting impressions, challenging this informal description. We show, using a linear statistical model, that the ‘paradox’ is equivalent to a situation where the reliability diagram of any percentile forecast has a slope exceeding 1. The relationship with spread-error ratios is shown to be far less direct. We furthermore compute reliability diagrams of winter NAO forecasts using seasonal hindcasts from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts and the UK Meteorological Office. While these broadly exhibit slopes exceeding 1, there is evidence of asymmetry between upper and lower terciles, indicating a potential violation of linearity/Gaussianity. The limitations and benefits of reliability diagrams as a diagnostic tool are discussed. |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Strommen, Kristian MacRae, Molly Christensen, Hannah |
spellingShingle |
Strommen, Kristian MacRae, Molly Christensen, Hannah Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation |
author_facet |
Strommen, Kristian MacRae, Molly Christensen, Hannah |
author_sort |
Strommen, Kristian |
title |
Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation |
title_short |
Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation |
title_full |
Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation |
title_fullStr |
Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter North Atlantic Oscilation |
title_sort |
using reliability diagrams to interpret the ‘signal-to-noise paradox’ in seasonal forecasts of the winter north atlantic oscilation |
publisher |
Authorea, Inc. |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898485.56269215/v1 |
genre |
North Atlantic |
genre_facet |
North Atlantic |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167898485.56269215/v1 |
_version_ |
1800757519209988096 |