Assessing reliability of 2D resistivity imaging in mountain permafrost studies using the depth of investigation index method

• Published in: Near Surface Geophysics
• Main Authors: Marescot, L., Loke, M.H., Chapellier, D., Delaloye, R., Lambiel, C., Reynard, E.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2002
• Subjects: Jura; Ice; permafrost
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2002007; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3997%2F1873-0604.2002007; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3997/1873-0604.2002007

ABSTRACT 2D electrical resistivity tomography has been applied within a mountain permafrost environment to assist in ice location. In the context of climate change, a warming process could partially thaw this permafrost and thereby increase the risk of slope instabilities. The extent and location of permafrost are therefore of considerable interest to civil engineers. The most challenging aspect of resistivity surveys on mountain permafrost concerns the surface layer, which mainly consists of large blocks with air voids. To overcome the very poor electrical contact, long steel stakes and sponges soaked in salt water are used as electrodes. Nevertheless, only a weak current can be injected. Another challenging aspect is the high resistivity contrast between frozen and unfrozen material, which makes inversion and interpretation difficult and problematic. In order to assess whether features at depth, indicated by the data, are real or are artefacts of the inversion process, a special inversion algorithm was applied to process depth of investigation (DOI) index maps. This method carries out two inversions of the same data set using different values of the reference resistivity. The two inversions give the same resistivity values in areas where the data contain information about the resistivity of the subsurface. On the other hand, the final result depends on the reference resistivity in areas where the data do not constrain the model. As can be deduced from field data from the Swiss Alps and the Jura Mountains, this methodology prevents over‐interpretations or misinterpretations of inversion results in mountain permafrost studies. From the DOI calculations, it is evident that little reliable information on the bedrock under the massive ice can be obtained and that the resistivity within the high resistivity zones cannot be determined accurately. The DOI map also helps to explain the occurrence of erratic and non‐geological structures at depth and indicates to what depth an inverted resistivity profile can provide ...