Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland

Abstract Questions: How does vegetation first establish on newly‐formed lava substrates? Do very small (cm) and meso‐scale (m) variations in the physical environment influence this process and subsequent vegetation development? Location: Mount Hekla, southern Iceland (64°00’ N, 19°40’ W). Methods: D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Vegetation Science
Main Authors: Cutler, N.A., Belyea, L.R., Dugmore, A.J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2008-8-18371
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3170%2F2008-8-18371
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3170/2008-8-18371
id crwiley:10.3170/2008-8-18371
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.3170/2008-8-18371 2024-09-15T18:13:35+00:00 Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland Cutler, N.A. Belyea, L.R. Dugmore, A.J. 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2008-8-18371 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3170%2F2008-8-18371 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3170/2008-8-18371 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Vegetation Science volume 19, issue 2, page 277-286 ISSN 1100-9233 1654-1103 journal-article 2008 crwiley https://doi.org/10.3170/2008-8-18371 2024-08-09T04:23:48Z Abstract Questions: How does vegetation first establish on newly‐formed lava substrates? Do very small (cm) and meso‐scale (m) variations in the physical environment influence this process and subsequent vegetation development? Location: Mount Hekla, southern Iceland (64°00’ N, 19°40’ W). Methods: Data on vegetation structure and the incidence of ‘safe sites’ suitable for colonisation were collected from high and low points on the surfaces of lava flows emplaced during the 1991 and 2000 A.D. eruptions of Mount Hekla. Effects of flow age and meso‐topographic position on vegetation structure (moss cover, patch density, stem length) were assessed by two‐way analyses of variance. The distributions of colonisation events and available safe sites were analysed using point pattern techniques. Results: Rapid colonisation of the lava surface was observed, despite stressful environmental conditions. The 1991 and 2000 flows differed significantly in vegetation structure, but there were no significant differences in moss cover, patch density and stem length between ‘high’ and ‘low’ sites. Conclusions: Colonisation events are invariably associated with small‐scale irregularities on the surface of the lava. The colonisation process appears to be spatially random. Development of the moss ‘carpet’ proceeds by vertical thickening and lateral growth and coalescence of moss patches that establish in ‘safe sites’. This process is rapid, with close to 100% of available safe sites exploited within 20 years. Topographic position makes no difference to the very early stages of vegetation development and cannot be used to ‘forecast’ the later stages of development. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Wiley Online Library Journal of Vegetation Science 19 2 277 286
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Questions: How does vegetation first establish on newly‐formed lava substrates? Do very small (cm) and meso‐scale (m) variations in the physical environment influence this process and subsequent vegetation development? Location: Mount Hekla, southern Iceland (64°00’ N, 19°40’ W). Methods: Data on vegetation structure and the incidence of ‘safe sites’ suitable for colonisation were collected from high and low points on the surfaces of lava flows emplaced during the 1991 and 2000 A.D. eruptions of Mount Hekla. Effects of flow age and meso‐topographic position on vegetation structure (moss cover, patch density, stem length) were assessed by two‐way analyses of variance. The distributions of colonisation events and available safe sites were analysed using point pattern techniques. Results: Rapid colonisation of the lava surface was observed, despite stressful environmental conditions. The 1991 and 2000 flows differed significantly in vegetation structure, but there were no significant differences in moss cover, patch density and stem length between ‘high’ and ‘low’ sites. Conclusions: Colonisation events are invariably associated with small‐scale irregularities on the surface of the lava. The colonisation process appears to be spatially random. Development of the moss ‘carpet’ proceeds by vertical thickening and lateral growth and coalescence of moss patches that establish in ‘safe sites’. This process is rapid, with close to 100% of available safe sites exploited within 20 years. Topographic position makes no difference to the very early stages of vegetation development and cannot be used to ‘forecast’ the later stages of development.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cutler, N.A.
Belyea, L.R.
Dugmore, A.J.
spellingShingle Cutler, N.A.
Belyea, L.R.
Dugmore, A.J.
Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland
author_facet Cutler, N.A.
Belyea, L.R.
Dugmore, A.J.
author_sort Cutler, N.A.
title Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland
title_short Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland
title_full Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland
title_fullStr Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on Mount Hekla, Iceland
title_sort spatial patterns of microsite colonisation on two young lava flows on mount hekla, iceland
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2008-8-18371
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3170%2F2008-8-18371
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3170/2008-8-18371
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Journal of Vegetation Science
volume 19, issue 2, page 277-286
ISSN 1100-9233 1654-1103
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3170/2008-8-18371
container_title Journal of Vegetation Science
container_volume 19
container_issue 2
container_start_page 277
op_container_end_page 286
_version_ 1810451352441061376