Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting

Question: How does the vegetation of boreal forests respond to harvesting and scarification? Location: 650 m a.s.l., central Sweden (61°38’ N). Methods: The response of boreal forest vegetation to cutting and scarification was studied in a field trial, which consisted of three treatments plus conven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Vegetation Science
Main Authors: Bergstedt, Johan, Hagner, Mats, Milberg, Per
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2007-7-18343
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3170%2F2007-7-18343
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3170/2007-7-18343
id crwiley:10.3170/2007-7-18343
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.3170/2007-7-18343 2024-04-07T07:52:14+00:00 Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting Bergstedt, Johan Hagner, Mats Milberg, Per 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2007-7-18343 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3170%2F2007-7-18343 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3170/2007-7-18343 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Applied Vegetation Science volume 11, issue 2, page 159-168 ISSN 1402-2001 1654-109X Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Nature and Landscape Conservation Ecology journal-article 2008 crwiley https://doi.org/10.3170/2007-7-18343 2024-03-08T03:53:56Z Question: How does the vegetation of boreal forests respond to harvesting and scarification? Location: 650 m a.s.l., central Sweden (61°38’ N). Methods: The response of boreal forest vegetation to cutting and scarification was studied in a field trial, which consisted of three treatments plus conventional harvesting as a control in a complete block design with four replicates. The cutting was done 14 years prior to vegetation inventory and scarification and planting were conducted the first or second years after cutting. Results: The species most abundant at higher cutting intensities were crustose lichens, Cladonia spp., Cladina arbuscula, Polytrichum spp. and pioneer mosses, the grass Deschampsia flexuosa , and the tree Betula pubescens , A few species had substantially lower abundance in treatments with higher cutting intensity, notably Hylocomium splendens and Vaccinium myrtillus. Scarification had a strong effect that was different from the one created by cutting. In scarification treatments, Polytrichum spp. were the only species with high abundance; most species had low abundance, i.e. Barbilophozia lycopodioides, Vaccinium vitis‐idaea, Pleurozium schreberi, Carex globularis, Empetrum nigrum, Cladina arbuscula, Sphagnum spp. Conclusions: Our results elaborate on the details of the well‐known effect of cutting on ground‐layer flora, and also give support for the profound and long‐lasting effect that soil scarification has on forest vegetation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Empetrum nigrum Wiley Online Library Applied Vegetation Science 11 2 159 168
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
spellingShingle Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
Bergstedt, Johan
Hagner, Mats
Milberg, Per
Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting
topic_facet Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
description Question: How does the vegetation of boreal forests respond to harvesting and scarification? Location: 650 m a.s.l., central Sweden (61°38’ N). Methods: The response of boreal forest vegetation to cutting and scarification was studied in a field trial, which consisted of three treatments plus conventional harvesting as a control in a complete block design with four replicates. The cutting was done 14 years prior to vegetation inventory and scarification and planting were conducted the first or second years after cutting. Results: The species most abundant at higher cutting intensities were crustose lichens, Cladonia spp., Cladina arbuscula, Polytrichum spp. and pioneer mosses, the grass Deschampsia flexuosa , and the tree Betula pubescens , A few species had substantially lower abundance in treatments with higher cutting intensity, notably Hylocomium splendens and Vaccinium myrtillus. Scarification had a strong effect that was different from the one created by cutting. In scarification treatments, Polytrichum spp. were the only species with high abundance; most species had low abundance, i.e. Barbilophozia lycopodioides, Vaccinium vitis‐idaea, Pleurozium schreberi, Carex globularis, Empetrum nigrum, Cladina arbuscula, Sphagnum spp. Conclusions: Our results elaborate on the details of the well‐known effect of cutting on ground‐layer flora, and also give support for the profound and long‐lasting effect that soil scarification has on forest vegetation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bergstedt, Johan
Hagner, Mats
Milberg, Per
author_facet Bergstedt, Johan
Hagner, Mats
Milberg, Per
author_sort Bergstedt, Johan
title Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting
title_short Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting
title_full Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting
title_fullStr Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting
title_full_unstemmed Effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting
title_sort effects on vegetation composition of a modified forest harvesting and propagation method compared with clear‐cutting, scarification and planting
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2007-7-18343
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3170%2F2007-7-18343
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3170/2007-7-18343
genre Empetrum nigrum
genre_facet Empetrum nigrum
op_source Applied Vegetation Science
volume 11, issue 2, page 159-168
ISSN 1402-2001 1654-109X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3170/2007-7-18343
container_title Applied Vegetation Science
container_volume 11
container_issue 2
container_start_page 159
op_container_end_page 168
_version_ 1795667455980339200