Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?

Abstract Objective . To test the hypothesis that the decision to use epidural analgesia during labor is influenced not only by the woman and her background but also by the local cultural practice in the delivery unit. Design. Population‐based cohort study. Setting. All delivery units in Sweden. Popu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Main Authors: SCHYTT, ERICA, WALDENSTRÖM, ULLA
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016340903280974
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3109%2F00016340903280974
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00016340903280974
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.3109/00016340903280974
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00016340903280974
id crwiley:10.3109/00016340903280974
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.3109/00016340903280974 2024-06-23T07:55:25+00:00 Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice? SCHYTT, ERICA WALDENSTRÖM, ULLA 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016340903280974 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3109%2F00016340903280974 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00016340903280974 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.3109/00016340903280974 https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00016340903280974 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica volume 89, issue 2, page 238-242 ISSN 0001-6349 1600-0412 journal-article 2010 crwiley https://doi.org/10.3109/00016340903280974 2024-06-04T06:39:48Z Abstract Objective . To test the hypothesis that the decision to use epidural analgesia during labor is influenced not only by the woman and her background but also by the local cultural practice in the delivery unit. Design. Population‐based cohort study. Setting. All delivery units in Sweden. Population. A nationwide sample of 2,529 women. Methods . Data were collected by questionnaires in early pregnancy and two months after birth, and from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Logistic regression analysis was conducted, adjusted for gestational age, induction of labor and infant birthweight. Main outcome measures. Epidural analgesia during labor. Results . The odds of having an epidural analgesia were more than twice as high in the Stockholm region (odds ratio (OR) 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–3.4) and three times higher in middle‐north Sweden (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.7–5.3) compared with the south of Sweden. Of the maternal factors, nulliparity was the strongest predictor (OR 6.3; 95% CI 5.1–7.9), followed by a prenatal belief that epidural analgesia would be needed (OR 3.5; 95% CI 2.8–4.4). Conclusion . The hypothesis of the study was confirmed. The woman and her background as well as the local cultural practice in the delivery unit matter with regard to the use of epidural analgesia. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Sweden Wiley Online Library Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 89 2 238 242
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Objective . To test the hypothesis that the decision to use epidural analgesia during labor is influenced not only by the woman and her background but also by the local cultural practice in the delivery unit. Design. Population‐based cohort study. Setting. All delivery units in Sweden. Population. A nationwide sample of 2,529 women. Methods . Data were collected by questionnaires in early pregnancy and two months after birth, and from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Logistic regression analysis was conducted, adjusted for gestational age, induction of labor and infant birthweight. Main outcome measures. Epidural analgesia during labor. Results . The odds of having an epidural analgesia were more than twice as high in the Stockholm region (odds ratio (OR) 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–3.4) and three times higher in middle‐north Sweden (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.7–5.3) compared with the south of Sweden. Of the maternal factors, nulliparity was the strongest predictor (OR 6.3; 95% CI 5.1–7.9), followed by a prenatal belief that epidural analgesia would be needed (OR 3.5; 95% CI 2.8–4.4). Conclusion . The hypothesis of the study was confirmed. The woman and her background as well as the local cultural practice in the delivery unit matter with regard to the use of epidural analgesia.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author SCHYTT, ERICA
WALDENSTRÖM, ULLA
spellingShingle SCHYTT, ERICA
WALDENSTRÖM, ULLA
Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?
author_facet SCHYTT, ERICA
WALDENSTRÖM, ULLA
author_sort SCHYTT, ERICA
title Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?
title_short Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?
title_full Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?
title_fullStr Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?
title_full_unstemmed Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?
title_sort epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2010
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016340903280974
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.3109%2F00016340903280974
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00016340903280974
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.3109/00016340903280974
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00016340903280974
genre North Sweden
genre_facet North Sweden
op_source Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
volume 89, issue 2, page 238-242
ISSN 0001-6349 1600-0412
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3109/00016340903280974
container_title Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
container_volume 89
container_issue 2
container_start_page 238
op_container_end_page 242
_version_ 1802648027873148928