Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese

In this paper, we report two new simple field methods to assess changes in pectoral muscle mass in live moulting geese. In the first method, transverse chest profiles of Canada geese Branta canadensis and greylag geese Anser anser were recorded using soldering wire. This standard measure of the ches...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Biology
Main Authors: Nyeland, Jens, Fox, Anthony D., Kahlert, Johnny, Therkildsen, Ole R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.029
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/wlb.2003.029
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.2003.029
id crwiley:10.2981/wlb.2003.029
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2981/wlb.2003.029 2023-12-03T10:20:31+01:00 Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese Nyeland, Jens Fox, Anthony D. Kahlert, Johnny Therkildsen, Ole R. 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.029 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/wlb.2003.029 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.2003.029 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Wildlife Biology volume 9, issue 2, page 155-159 ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Nature and Landscape Conservation Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2003 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.029 2023-11-09T13:26:53Z In this paper, we report two new simple field methods to assess changes in pectoral muscle mass in live moulting geese. In the first method, transverse chest profiles of Canada geese Branta canadensis and greylag geese Anser anser were recorded using soldering wire. This standard measure of the chest angle showed a highly significant relationship with actual pectoral muscle mass. Chest angle measures showed a highly significant polynomial correlation with an index of moult stage, i.e. length of the ninth primary (p9). This indicated an initial slight decline in pectoral muscle mass as p9 length increased, followed by an increase in muscle mass in preparation for regaining the ability to fly. In the second method, visual pectoral profile scores from 0 (thin pectoral muscles concave) to 3 (convex bulky) recorded at distances using telescope or binoculars also proved to be useful as a field measure of pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese. Hence, the first method provides a non‐consumptive means of predicting pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese without the need to dissect birds, and the second method enables field prediction of muscle mass in moulting geese without resort to capture of birds. Article in Journal/Newspaper Branta canadensis Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) Canada Wildlife Biology 9 2 155 159
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Nyeland, Jens
Fox, Anthony D.
Kahlert, Johnny
Therkildsen, Ole R.
Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese
topic_facet Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description In this paper, we report two new simple field methods to assess changes in pectoral muscle mass in live moulting geese. In the first method, transverse chest profiles of Canada geese Branta canadensis and greylag geese Anser anser were recorded using soldering wire. This standard measure of the chest angle showed a highly significant relationship with actual pectoral muscle mass. Chest angle measures showed a highly significant polynomial correlation with an index of moult stage, i.e. length of the ninth primary (p9). This indicated an initial slight decline in pectoral muscle mass as p9 length increased, followed by an increase in muscle mass in preparation for regaining the ability to fly. In the second method, visual pectoral profile scores from 0 (thin pectoral muscles concave) to 3 (convex bulky) recorded at distances using telescope or binoculars also proved to be useful as a field measure of pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese. Hence, the first method provides a non‐consumptive means of predicting pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese without the need to dissect birds, and the second method enables field prediction of muscle mass in moulting geese without resort to capture of birds.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nyeland, Jens
Fox, Anthony D.
Kahlert, Johnny
Therkildsen, Ole R.
author_facet Nyeland, Jens
Fox, Anthony D.
Kahlert, Johnny
Therkildsen, Ole R.
author_sort Nyeland, Jens
title Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese
title_short Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese
title_full Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese
title_fullStr Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese
title_full_unstemmed Field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese
title_sort field methods to assess pectoral muscle mass in moulting geese
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.029
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/wlb.2003.029
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.2003.029
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Branta canadensis
genre_facet Branta canadensis
op_source Wildlife Biology
volume 9, issue 2, page 155-159
ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.029
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 9
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
op_container_end_page 159
_version_ 1784267951835185152