Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?

In 1999 and 2001, we compared the population characteristics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus , black grouse T. tetrix and hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia inside the pristine forest reserve State Natural Reserve ‘Pinezhskiy’ in northwestern Russia and in the logged forests surrounding the reserve. We al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Biology
Main Authors: Borchtchevski, Vladimir G., Hjeljord, Olav, Wegge, Per, Sivkov, Andrey V.
Other Authors: Norges Forskningsråd
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.015
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/wlb.2003.015
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.2003.015
id crwiley:10.2981/wlb.2003.015
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2981/wlb.2003.015 2024-06-02T07:54:12+00:00 Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests? Borchtchevski, Vladimir G. Hjeljord, Olav Wegge, Per Sivkov, Andrey V. Norges Forskningsråd 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.015 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/wlb.2003.015 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.2003.015 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Wildlife Biology volume 9, issue 4, page 275-282 ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X journal-article 2003 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.015 2024-05-06T06:55:31Z In 1999 and 2001, we compared the population characteristics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus , black grouse T. tetrix and hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia inside the pristine forest reserve State Natural Reserve ‘Pinezhskiy’ in northwestern Russia and in the logged forests surrounding the reserve. We also compared the abundance of mammalian predators and birds of prey. The August density of capercaillie was lower in logged forests than in the reserve (P = 0.05), but black grouse tended to be more abundant in the logged area (P = 0.08). For hazel grouse, no difference in abundance was found between the reserve and the logged area. Reproductive success of all three grouse species was generally higher in the logged area than in the reserve. A winter track survey indicated low abundance (< 1 track/10 km/24 hours) and no difference in density of small and mediumsized mammalian predators between the reserve and the logged area. The only exception was red fox Vulpes vulpes whose tracks were recorded only in the logged area. Buzzards Buteo spp. and goshawk Accipiter gentilis were the most numerous birds of prey. Goshawk tended to be more common in the reserve (P = 0.09), whereas buzzards were seen more often in the logged area (P = 0.1). Tracks of mountain hare Lepus timidus was twice as abundant in the logged forest (P = 0.02), whereas tracks of red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris was almost 10 times more numerous in the reserve (P < 0.001) than in the logged area. Judged by the remains found, the majority (72%) of grouse were killed by birds of prey. Our study suggests that reproduction of all three species of forest grouse in this region remains stable or increases following logging. We hypothesise that this may be due to the type of logging performed and to differences in the composition of predators and of prey other than grouse inside and outside the reserve. Article in Journal/Newspaper Accipiter gentilis Lepus timidus mountain hare Wiley Online Library Wildlife Biology 9 4 275 282
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description In 1999 and 2001, we compared the population characteristics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus , black grouse T. tetrix and hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia inside the pristine forest reserve State Natural Reserve ‘Pinezhskiy’ in northwestern Russia and in the logged forests surrounding the reserve. We also compared the abundance of mammalian predators and birds of prey. The August density of capercaillie was lower in logged forests than in the reserve (P = 0.05), but black grouse tended to be more abundant in the logged area (P = 0.08). For hazel grouse, no difference in abundance was found between the reserve and the logged area. Reproductive success of all three grouse species was generally higher in the logged area than in the reserve. A winter track survey indicated low abundance (< 1 track/10 km/24 hours) and no difference in density of small and mediumsized mammalian predators between the reserve and the logged area. The only exception was red fox Vulpes vulpes whose tracks were recorded only in the logged area. Buzzards Buteo spp. and goshawk Accipiter gentilis were the most numerous birds of prey. Goshawk tended to be more common in the reserve (P = 0.09), whereas buzzards were seen more often in the logged area (P = 0.1). Tracks of mountain hare Lepus timidus was twice as abundant in the logged forest (P = 0.02), whereas tracks of red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris was almost 10 times more numerous in the reserve (P < 0.001) than in the logged area. Judged by the remains found, the majority (72%) of grouse were killed by birds of prey. Our study suggests that reproduction of all three species of forest grouse in this region remains stable or increases following logging. We hypothesise that this may be due to the type of logging performed and to differences in the composition of predators and of prey other than grouse inside and outside the reserve.
author2 Norges Forskningsråd
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Borchtchevski, Vladimir G.
Hjeljord, Olav
Wegge, Per
Sivkov, Andrey V.
spellingShingle Borchtchevski, Vladimir G.
Hjeljord, Olav
Wegge, Per
Sivkov, Andrey V.
Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?
author_facet Borchtchevski, Vladimir G.
Hjeljord, Olav
Wegge, Per
Sivkov, Andrey V.
author_sort Borchtchevski, Vladimir G.
title Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?
title_short Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?
title_full Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?
title_fullStr Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?
title_full_unstemmed Does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?
title_sort does fragmentation by logging reduce grouse reproductive success in boreal forests?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.015
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/wlb.2003.015
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.2003.015
genre Accipiter gentilis
Lepus timidus
mountain hare
genre_facet Accipiter gentilis
Lepus timidus
mountain hare
op_source Wildlife Biology
volume 9, issue 4, page 275-282
ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.015
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 275
op_container_end_page 282
_version_ 1800745552144498688