Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos

Knowing animals' gut retention time (GRT) for important food items is critical when using non‐invasive studies based on faecal remains, e.g. when analysing nutritive quality of food, or relating diet or behaviour to movements. We analysed GRT in six captive brown bears Ursus arctos , after feed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Biology
Main Authors: Elfström, Marcus, St⊘en, Ole‐Gunnar, Zedrosser, Andreas, Warrington, Ian, Swenson, Jon E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/12-121
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/12-121
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/12-121
id crwiley:10.2981/12-121
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2981/12-121 2024-04-28T08:36:54+00:00 Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos Elfström, Marcus St⊘en, Ole‐Gunnar Zedrosser, Andreas Warrington, Ian Swenson, Jon E. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/12-121 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/12-121 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/12-121 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Wildlife Biology volume 19, issue 3, page 317-324 ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Nature and Landscape Conservation Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2013 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2981/12-121 2024-04-02T08:43:49Z Knowing animals' gut retention time (GRT) for important food items is critical when using non‐invasive studies based on faecal remains, e.g. when analysing nutritive quality of food, or relating diet or behaviour to movements. We analysed GRT in six captive brown bears Ursus arctos , after feeding on either berries (a mixture of bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus and lingonberry V. vitis‐idaea ) or animal carcasses (either reindeer Rangifer tarandus, European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, domestic pig Sus scrofa domestica, cattle Bos taurus or horse Equus ferus caballus ). Median GRT 50% (i.e. when 50% of all faeces containing experimental food had been defecated) was 5 hours and 47 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 4 hours and 36 minutes and 7 hours and 3 minutes; N = 20) after feeding on berries and 14 hours and 30 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 10 hours and 9 minutes and 16 hours and 57 minutes; N = 20) after feeding on carcasses. Median GRT min (i.e. first defecation comprised of experimental food) was 3 hours and 5 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 1 hour and 51 minutes and 4 hours and 12 minutes; N = 21) for berries and 8 hours and 2 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 6 hours and 14 minutes and 10 hours and 44 minutes; N = 20) for carcasses. Median GRT max (i.e. last defecation comprised of experimental food) was 15 hours and 27 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 11 hours and 36 minutes and 17 hours and 16 minutes; N = 21) for berries and 16 hours and 16 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 12 hours and 11 minutes and 17 hours and 27 minutes; N = 20) for carcasses. A carcass diet had 6 hours and 26 minutes ± 1 hour and 56 minutes (SE) longer GRT 50% than a berry diet (N = 39), despite low variation in food intake. Activity level, feeding time (midday/midnight), sex, age (subadult/adult), ingested amounts of food, prior food remains processed by the gut (i.e. cumulative faeces weight) and defecation rate did not influence the GRT 50% . Our reported GRT estimates are reliable values to be used within research and ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Rangifer tarandus Ursus arctos Wiley Online Library Wildlife Biology 19 3 317 324
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Elfström, Marcus
St⊘en, Ole‐Gunnar
Zedrosser, Andreas
Warrington, Ian
Swenson, Jon E.
Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos
topic_facet Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Knowing animals' gut retention time (GRT) for important food items is critical when using non‐invasive studies based on faecal remains, e.g. when analysing nutritive quality of food, or relating diet or behaviour to movements. We analysed GRT in six captive brown bears Ursus arctos , after feeding on either berries (a mixture of bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus and lingonberry V. vitis‐idaea ) or animal carcasses (either reindeer Rangifer tarandus, European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, domestic pig Sus scrofa domestica, cattle Bos taurus or horse Equus ferus caballus ). Median GRT 50% (i.e. when 50% of all faeces containing experimental food had been defecated) was 5 hours and 47 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 4 hours and 36 minutes and 7 hours and 3 minutes; N = 20) after feeding on berries and 14 hours and 30 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 10 hours and 9 minutes and 16 hours and 57 minutes; N = 20) after feeding on carcasses. Median GRT min (i.e. first defecation comprised of experimental food) was 3 hours and 5 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 1 hour and 51 minutes and 4 hours and 12 minutes; N = 21) for berries and 8 hours and 2 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 6 hours and 14 minutes and 10 hours and 44 minutes; N = 20) for carcasses. Median GRT max (i.e. last defecation comprised of experimental food) was 15 hours and 27 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 11 hours and 36 minutes and 17 hours and 16 minutes; N = 21) for berries and 16 hours and 16 minutes (1st and 3rd quartiles = 12 hours and 11 minutes and 17 hours and 27 minutes; N = 20) for carcasses. A carcass diet had 6 hours and 26 minutes ± 1 hour and 56 minutes (SE) longer GRT 50% than a berry diet (N = 39), despite low variation in food intake. Activity level, feeding time (midday/midnight), sex, age (subadult/adult), ingested amounts of food, prior food remains processed by the gut (i.e. cumulative faeces weight) and defecation rate did not influence the GRT 50% . Our reported GRT estimates are reliable values to be used within research and ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Elfström, Marcus
St⊘en, Ole‐Gunnar
Zedrosser, Andreas
Warrington, Ian
Swenson, Jon E.
author_facet Elfström, Marcus
St⊘en, Ole‐Gunnar
Zedrosser, Andreas
Warrington, Ian
Swenson, Jon E.
author_sort Elfström, Marcus
title Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos
title_short Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos
title_full Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos
title_fullStr Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos
title_full_unstemmed Gut retention time in captive brown bears Ursus arctos
title_sort gut retention time in captive brown bears ursus arctos
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/12-121
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/12-121
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/12-121
genre Rangifer tarandus
Ursus arctos
genre_facet Rangifer tarandus
Ursus arctos
op_source Wildlife Biology
volume 19, issue 3, page 317-324
ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2981/12-121
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 19
container_issue 3
container_start_page 317
op_container_end_page 324
_version_ 1797568482391359488