Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates

Knowing kill rate is essential for knowing the basic nature of predation. We compared estimates of kill rate for previously observed wolf‐prey systems with new observations from wolves Canis lupus which preyed on white‐tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus in Michigan, USA. For the five packs that we s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Biology
Main Authors: Vucetich, John A., Huntzinger, Brett A., Peterson, Rolf O., Vucetich, Leah M., Hammill, James H., Beyer, Dean E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/11-061
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/11-061
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/11-061
id crwiley:10.2981/11-061
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2981/11-061 2024-09-15T18:01:08+00:00 Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates Vucetich, John A. Huntzinger, Brett A. Peterson, Rolf O. Vucetich, Leah M. Hammill, James H. Beyer, Dean E. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/11-061 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/11-061 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/11-061 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Wildlife Biology volume 18, issue 3, page 235-245 ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X journal-article 2012 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2981/11-061 2024-07-11T04:34:27Z Knowing kill rate is essential for knowing the basic nature of predation. We compared estimates of kill rate for previously observed wolf‐prey systems with new observations from wolves Canis lupus which preyed on white‐tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus in Michigan, USA. For the five packs that we studied during 2001‐2004, the mean kill rate was 0.68 kill/pack/day (∼7.7 kg/wolf/day). However, kill rates varied considerably. In particular, the coefficient of variation associated with the means was 0.55 for kills/pack/day and 0.68 for kg/wolf/day. Our analysis of previously observed kill rates also revealed a negative correlation between the duration of observation and the estimated kill rate. This correlation is the basis for showing how most published estimates of kill rate for wolves during winter tend to overestimate, by 50%, the season‐long average kill rate during winter. The negative association between duration of observation and estimated kill rate occurs, in part, because wolves are unable to maintain very high kill rates for a long time. We also document how estimates of kill rate based on ground tracking tended to be 3.3 times greater than aerial‐based estimates (2.4 vs 7.9 kg/wolf/day). Ground tracking is better able to detect multiple carcasses at one site, and better able to detect carcasses when wolves bed far from their kills. These previously undocumented biases are surprising given that wolves are so extensively studied. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Wiley Online Library Wildlife Biology 18 3 235 245
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Knowing kill rate is essential for knowing the basic nature of predation. We compared estimates of kill rate for previously observed wolf‐prey systems with new observations from wolves Canis lupus which preyed on white‐tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus in Michigan, USA. For the five packs that we studied during 2001‐2004, the mean kill rate was 0.68 kill/pack/day (∼7.7 kg/wolf/day). However, kill rates varied considerably. In particular, the coefficient of variation associated with the means was 0.55 for kills/pack/day and 0.68 for kg/wolf/day. Our analysis of previously observed kill rates also revealed a negative correlation between the duration of observation and the estimated kill rate. This correlation is the basis for showing how most published estimates of kill rate for wolves during winter tend to overestimate, by 50%, the season‐long average kill rate during winter. The negative association between duration of observation and estimated kill rate occurs, in part, because wolves are unable to maintain very high kill rates for a long time. We also document how estimates of kill rate based on ground tracking tended to be 3.3 times greater than aerial‐based estimates (2.4 vs 7.9 kg/wolf/day). Ground tracking is better able to detect multiple carcasses at one site, and better able to detect carcasses when wolves bed far from their kills. These previously undocumented biases are surprising given that wolves are so extensively studied.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Vucetich, John A.
Huntzinger, Brett A.
Peterson, Rolf O.
Vucetich, Leah M.
Hammill, James H.
Beyer, Dean E.
spellingShingle Vucetich, John A.
Huntzinger, Brett A.
Peterson, Rolf O.
Vucetich, Leah M.
Hammill, James H.
Beyer, Dean E.
Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates
author_facet Vucetich, John A.
Huntzinger, Brett A.
Peterson, Rolf O.
Vucetich, Leah M.
Hammill, James H.
Beyer, Dean E.
author_sort Vucetich, John A.
title Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates
title_short Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates
title_full Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates
title_fullStr Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates
title_full_unstemmed Intra‐seasonal variation in wolf Canis lupus kill rates
title_sort intra‐seasonal variation in wolf canis lupus kill rates
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/11-061
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/11-061
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/11-061
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Wildlife Biology
volume 18, issue 3, page 235-245
ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2981/11-061
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 18
container_issue 3
container_start_page 235
op_container_end_page 245
_version_ 1810438333004775424