The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus

Abstract Estimating density, age and sex structure of wild populations is a key objective in wildlife management. Live trapping is frequently used to collect data on populations of small and medium‐sized mammals. Ideally, sampling mammal populations by live capturing of individuals provides a random...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Biology
Main Authors: Bisi, Francesco, Newey, Scott, Nodari, Mosè, Wauters, Lucas A., Harrison, Annabel, Thirgood, Simon, Martinoli, Adriano
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/10-133
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/10-133
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/10-133
id crwiley:10.2981/10-133
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2981/10-133 2023-12-03T10:25:34+01:00 The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus Bisi, Francesco Newey, Scott Nodari, Mosè Wauters, Lucas A. Harrison, Annabel Thirgood, Simon Martinoli, Adriano 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/10-133 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/10-133 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/10-133 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Wildlife Biology volume 17, issue 3, page 311-316 ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Nature and Landscape Conservation Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2011 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2981/10-133 2023-11-09T14:24:01Z Abstract Estimating density, age and sex structure of wild populations is a key objective in wildlife management. Live trapping is frequently used to collect data on populations of small and medium‐sized mammals. Ideally, sampling mammal populations by live capturing of individuals provides a random and representative sample of the target population. Trapping data may, however, be biased. We used live‐capture data from mountain hares Lepus timidus in Scotland to assess sampling bias between two different capture methods. We captured hares using baited cage traps and long nets on five study areas in the Scottish Highlands. After controlling for the effects of body size, individuals caught in traps were lighter than individuals caught using long nets, suggesting that the body condition of hares differed between the capture methods. This tendency may reflect an increased risk‐taking of individuals in poorer body condition and less aversion to entering traps in order to benefit from eating bait. Overall, we caught more adult hares than juveniles and more female hares than males. Our results show that estimates of density and population structure of mountain hares using live‐capture data could be affected by the capture method used. We suggest that live‐capture studies employ more than one capture method and test for heterogeneity in capture probability to minimise potential bias and achieve reliable estimates of population parameters. Article in Journal/Newspaper Lepus timidus Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) Wildlife Biology 17 3 311 316
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Bisi, Francesco
Newey, Scott
Nodari, Mosè
Wauters, Lucas A.
Harrison, Annabel
Thirgood, Simon
Martinoli, Adriano
The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus
topic_facet Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Abstract Estimating density, age and sex structure of wild populations is a key objective in wildlife management. Live trapping is frequently used to collect data on populations of small and medium‐sized mammals. Ideally, sampling mammal populations by live capturing of individuals provides a random and representative sample of the target population. Trapping data may, however, be biased. We used live‐capture data from mountain hares Lepus timidus in Scotland to assess sampling bias between two different capture methods. We captured hares using baited cage traps and long nets on five study areas in the Scottish Highlands. After controlling for the effects of body size, individuals caught in traps were lighter than individuals caught using long nets, suggesting that the body condition of hares differed between the capture methods. This tendency may reflect an increased risk‐taking of individuals in poorer body condition and less aversion to entering traps in order to benefit from eating bait. Overall, we caught more adult hares than juveniles and more female hares than males. Our results show that estimates of density and population structure of mountain hares using live‐capture data could be affected by the capture method used. We suggest that live‐capture studies employ more than one capture method and test for heterogeneity in capture probability to minimise potential bias and achieve reliable estimates of population parameters.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bisi, Francesco
Newey, Scott
Nodari, Mosè
Wauters, Lucas A.
Harrison, Annabel
Thirgood, Simon
Martinoli, Adriano
author_facet Bisi, Francesco
Newey, Scott
Nodari, Mosè
Wauters, Lucas A.
Harrison, Annabel
Thirgood, Simon
Martinoli, Adriano
author_sort Bisi, Francesco
title The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus
title_short The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus
title_full The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus
title_fullStr The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus
title_full_unstemmed The strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares Lepus timidus
title_sort strong and the hungry: bias in capture methods for mountain hares lepus timidus
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2011
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/10-133
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2981/10-133
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.2981/10-133
genre Lepus timidus
genre_facet Lepus timidus
op_source Wildlife Biology
volume 17, issue 3, page 311-316
ISSN 1903-220X 1903-220X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2981/10-133
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 17
container_issue 3
container_start_page 311
op_container_end_page 316
_version_ 1784274511543140352