Phytogeographical and community similarities of alpine tundras of Changbaishan Summit, China, and Indian Peaks, USA

• Published in: Journal of Vegetation Science
• Main Authors: Qian, Hong, White, Peter S., Klinka, Karel, Chourmouzis, Christine
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1999
• Subjects: Plant Science; Ecology; Arctic; Indian; Tundra
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3237312; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F3237312; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/3237312

Abstract. We compared the diversity, phytogeography, and plant communities in two mid‐latitude alpine tundras with comparable aerial and elevational extents: Changbaishan Summit in eastern Asia and Indian Peaks in western North America. Despite wide separation, the two areas shared 72 species. In all, 43% of the species on Changbaishan Summit are also distributed in the alpine zones of western North America, while 22% of the species on Indian Peaks are also distributed in the alpine zones of eastern Asia. Almost all the shared species also occur in the Beringian region. Phytogeographical profiles of species and genera showed that 69% of species and over 90% of genera in both alpine tundras belong to the three phytogeographical categories: cosmopolitan, circumpolar, and Asian‐North American. We attributed the current floristic relationship between these widely separated areas to the periodic past land connection between the two continents during the Tertiary and Pleistocene. Indian Peaks has a closer floristic relationship with the Arctic tundra than does Changbaishan Summit. Indian Peaks also has 45% higher species richness and lower vegetation cover than Changbaishan Summit. Plant communities from the two areas were completely separated in the two‐way indicator species analysis and non‐metric multidimensional scaling on floristic data at both species and generic levels, whereas ordination of communities by soil data produced a greater overlap. The plant communities on Changbaishan Summit in general have lower alpha diversity, higher beta diversity (lower between‐community floristic similarity), and more rare species than does Indian Peaks. Mosaic diversity does not differ in the two alpine tundras, although the analysis suggests that Changbaishan Summit communities are more widely spaced on gradients than the Indian Peaks communities.