Estimates of Movement and Site Fidelity Using Mark‐Resight Data of Wintering Canada Geese

• Published in: Ecology
• Main Authors: Hestbeck, Jay B., Nichols, James D., Malecki, Richard A.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1991
• Subjects: Canada; Branta canadensis
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937193; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F2937193; https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/2937193

Population ecologists have devoted disproportionate attention to the esti— mation and study of birth and death rates and far less effort to rates of movement. Movement and fidelity to wintering areas have important ecological and evolutionary implications for avian populations. Previous inferences about movement among and fidelity to wintering areas have been restricted by limitations of data and methodology. We use multiple observation data from a large—scale capture—resighting study of Canada Geese in the Atlantic flyway to estimate probabilities of returning to previous wintering locations and moving to new locations. Mark—resight data from 28,849 Canada Geese (Branta canadensis) banded woth individually coded neck bands in the mid—Atlantic (New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey), Chesapeake (Delaware, Maryland, Virginia), and Carolinas (North and South Carolina) were used to estimate movement and site—fidelity. Two three—sample mark—resight models were developed and programmed using SURVIV to estimate the probability of moving among or remaining within these three wintering regions. The model (MV2) that incorporated t radition" or memory of previous wintering regions fit the data better than the model (MV1) that assumes that a first—order Markov chain described movement among regions. Considerable levels of movement occured among regions of the Atlantic flyway. The annual probability of remaining in the same region for two successive winters, used as a measure of site fidelity, was 0.710 plus or minus 0.016 (estimated mean plus or minus SE, 0.889 plus or minus 0.006, and 0.562 plus or minus 0.025, for the mid—Atlantic, Chesapeake, and Carolinas, respectively. The estimated probability of moving between years corresponded to changes in winter harshness. In warm years, geese moved north and in cold years, they moved south. Geese had a high probability of moving to and remaining in the Chesapeake. Annual changes in the movement probabilities did not correspond to annual changes in the United States Fish and ...