Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types

Primary production, plant biomass, plant element content, and various measures of turnover and element cycling were compared among four contrasting tundra vegetation types near Toolik Lake, Alaska. The study sites were selected to represent extreme examples of the wide variation in plant growth form...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Monographs
Main Authors: Shaver, Gaius R., Chapin, F. Stuart
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1991
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942997
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1942997
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1942997
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1942997
id crwiley:10.2307/1942997
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2307/1942997 2024-09-30T14:31:46+00:00 Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types Shaver, Gaius R. Chapin, F. Stuart 1991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942997 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1942997 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1942997 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1942997 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ecological Monographs volume 61, issue 1, page 1-31 ISSN 0012-9615 1557-7015 journal-article 1991 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2307/1942997 2024-09-03T04:26:29Z Primary production, plant biomass, plant element content, and various measures of turnover and element cycling were compared among four contrasting tundra vegetation types near Toolik Lake, Alaska. The study sites were selected to represent extreme examples of the wide variation in plant growth form composition that is typical of northern ecosystems. The aim of the research was to determine whether vegetation types that differ in their dominant plant growth form also differ in their production: biomass relationships and overall patterns of element use. The four sites included tussock tundra, a deciduous shrub—dominated riparian tundra, an evergreen heath tundra, and wet sedge tundra. Biomass and element content (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) were determined for both vascular and nonvascular plants, and production estimates were obtained for vascular plants. Production and biomass of most tissues were determined by quadrat harvest methods, with additional, separate determinations of stem secondary growth and belowground rhizome growth as components of net primary production (NPP). Production, biomass, and element content of roots were not determined. Vascular plant biomass (excluding roots) varied by nearly 9 × among sites, from 217 to 1877 g/m 2 . At least 50% of the vascular biomass at all four sites was belowground stems, but the relative allocation to leaves vs. aboveground stems varied greatly. When mosses and lichens were included, total biomass varied by only 5 × among sites, and lichens were in fact the most abundant plant form at the evergreen heath site. The element content in vascular biomass of these communities varied by 8—21 ×, depending upon the element; including mosses and lichens, element content varied by 6—12 ×. Primary productivity of vascular plants also varied sharply among sites, from 32 to 305 g · m — 2 · yr — 1 (not including root production). Leaves were the largest single component of NPP at all sites, but the relative importance of above— and belowground stem growth varied considerably. The ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Tundra Alaska Wiley Online Library Arctic Ecological Monographs 61 1 1 31
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Primary production, plant biomass, plant element content, and various measures of turnover and element cycling were compared among four contrasting tundra vegetation types near Toolik Lake, Alaska. The study sites were selected to represent extreme examples of the wide variation in plant growth form composition that is typical of northern ecosystems. The aim of the research was to determine whether vegetation types that differ in their dominant plant growth form also differ in their production: biomass relationships and overall patterns of element use. The four sites included tussock tundra, a deciduous shrub—dominated riparian tundra, an evergreen heath tundra, and wet sedge tundra. Biomass and element content (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) were determined for both vascular and nonvascular plants, and production estimates were obtained for vascular plants. Production and biomass of most tissues were determined by quadrat harvest methods, with additional, separate determinations of stem secondary growth and belowground rhizome growth as components of net primary production (NPP). Production, biomass, and element content of roots were not determined. Vascular plant biomass (excluding roots) varied by nearly 9 × among sites, from 217 to 1877 g/m 2 . At least 50% of the vascular biomass at all four sites was belowground stems, but the relative allocation to leaves vs. aboveground stems varied greatly. When mosses and lichens were included, total biomass varied by only 5 × among sites, and lichens were in fact the most abundant plant form at the evergreen heath site. The element content in vascular biomass of these communities varied by 8—21 ×, depending upon the element; including mosses and lichens, element content varied by 6—12 ×. Primary productivity of vascular plants also varied sharply among sites, from 32 to 305 g · m — 2 · yr — 1 (not including root production). Leaves were the largest single component of NPP at all sites, but the relative importance of above— and belowground stem growth varied considerably. The ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shaver, Gaius R.
Chapin, F. Stuart
spellingShingle Shaver, Gaius R.
Chapin, F. Stuart
Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types
author_facet Shaver, Gaius R.
Chapin, F. Stuart
author_sort Shaver, Gaius R.
title Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types
title_short Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types
title_full Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types
title_fullStr Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types
title_full_unstemmed Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types
title_sort production: biomass relationships and element cycling in contrasting arctic vegetation types
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1991
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942997
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1942997
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1942997
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1942997
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
Alaska
op_source Ecological Monographs
volume 61, issue 1, page 1-31
ISSN 0012-9615 1557-7015
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2307/1942997
container_title Ecological Monographs
container_volume 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 31
_version_ 1811636148231995392