A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska

A model of radiation, air temperature, and vapor density in the vegetation canopy, plant water relations, and photosynthesis, developed in the primary production research program of the U.S. Tundra Biome, IBP, is described and results for the years 1970 through 1973 presented. The model calculates d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology
Main Authors: Miller, Philip C., Stoner, Wayne A., Tieszen, Larry L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1976
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936428
http://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1936428
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1936428
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1936428
id crwiley:10.2307/1936428
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2307/1936428 2024-06-23T07:51:39+00:00 A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska Miller, Philip C. Stoner, Wayne A. Tieszen, Larry L. 1976 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936428 http://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1936428 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1936428 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1936428 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ecology volume 57, issue 3, page 411-430 ISSN 0012-9658 1939-9170 journal-article 1976 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2307/1936428 2024-06-06T04:21:45Z A model of radiation, air temperature, and vapor density in the vegetation canopy, plant water relations, and photosynthesis, developed in the primary production research program of the U.S. Tundra Biome, IBP, is described and results for the years 1970 through 1973 presented. The model calculates daily courses of direct and diffuse solar radiation; infra—red radiation; wind; air temperature and humidity; leaf temperatures; convectional and transpirational exchange by leaves, stems, and dead material; leaf H_2O content, leaf water potential; leaf resistance to H_2O loss; internal resistance to CO_2 diffusion; and net photosynthesis. Climate varied from year to year: 1970 and 1971 were similar, 1972 was relatively warm and dry, and 1973 was relatively cold and wet. Plant parameters were obtained for Carex aquatilis, Dupontia fischeri, Eriophorum angustifollium, and Salix pulchra. Leaf area indices varied by species and by year. Leaf areas of all species were lowest in 1973. Of the incoming solar radiation ° 20% is reflected back and 32%—53% absorbed by the canopy, increasing with leaf area index. In the canopy 5—10 times more heat is lost by convection than by evaporation. Total seasonal vascular plant CO_2 uptake ranged from 400—627 g CO_2 m_G ( —2) (subscript G refers to ground). In 1971 cuvette estimates for total seasonal vascular plant CO 2 uptake were 602 while the model predicted 627. Individual species incorporated about 4 g CO_2 m_G ( —2) day ( —1) at most. The daily CO_2 incorporation was larger than the downward CO_2 flux from the atmosphere, implying that soil respiration is a source of CO_2 for the vascular plants. Photosynthesis increased with solar radiation, air and ground temperatures, and air vapor density and decreased with increasing infrared radiation for the sky and root resistance to water uptake. Factors increasing transpiration without directly affecting photosynthesis tend to decrease photosynthesis because of the effect on water stress. Net photosynthesis is higher at the top of the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Barrow Carex aquatilis Tundra Alaska Wiley Online Library Ecology 57 3 411 430
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description A model of radiation, air temperature, and vapor density in the vegetation canopy, plant water relations, and photosynthesis, developed in the primary production research program of the U.S. Tundra Biome, IBP, is described and results for the years 1970 through 1973 presented. The model calculates daily courses of direct and diffuse solar radiation; infra—red radiation; wind; air temperature and humidity; leaf temperatures; convectional and transpirational exchange by leaves, stems, and dead material; leaf H_2O content, leaf water potential; leaf resistance to H_2O loss; internal resistance to CO_2 diffusion; and net photosynthesis. Climate varied from year to year: 1970 and 1971 were similar, 1972 was relatively warm and dry, and 1973 was relatively cold and wet. Plant parameters were obtained for Carex aquatilis, Dupontia fischeri, Eriophorum angustifollium, and Salix pulchra. Leaf area indices varied by species and by year. Leaf areas of all species were lowest in 1973. Of the incoming solar radiation ° 20% is reflected back and 32%—53% absorbed by the canopy, increasing with leaf area index. In the canopy 5—10 times more heat is lost by convection than by evaporation. Total seasonal vascular plant CO_2 uptake ranged from 400—627 g CO_2 m_G ( —2) (subscript G refers to ground). In 1971 cuvette estimates for total seasonal vascular plant CO 2 uptake were 602 while the model predicted 627. Individual species incorporated about 4 g CO_2 m_G ( —2) day ( —1) at most. The daily CO_2 incorporation was larger than the downward CO_2 flux from the atmosphere, implying that soil respiration is a source of CO_2 for the vascular plants. Photosynthesis increased with solar radiation, air and ground temperatures, and air vapor density and decreased with increasing infrared radiation for the sky and root resistance to water uptake. Factors increasing transpiration without directly affecting photosynthesis tend to decrease photosynthesis because of the effect on water stress. Net photosynthesis is higher at the top of the ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Miller, Philip C.
Stoner, Wayne A.
Tieszen, Larry L.
spellingShingle Miller, Philip C.
Stoner, Wayne A.
Tieszen, Larry L.
A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska
author_facet Miller, Philip C.
Stoner, Wayne A.
Tieszen, Larry L.
author_sort Miller, Philip C.
title A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska
title_short A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska
title_full A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska
title_fullStr A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska
title_full_unstemmed A Model of Stand Photosynthesis for the Wet Meadow Tundra at Barrow, Alaska
title_sort model of stand photosynthesis for the wet meadow tundra at barrow, alaska
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1976
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936428
http://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1936428
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2307%2F1936428
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1936428
genre Barrow
Carex aquatilis
Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Barrow
Carex aquatilis
Tundra
Alaska
op_source Ecology
volume 57, issue 3, page 411-430
ISSN 0012-9658 1939-9170
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2307/1936428
container_title Ecology
container_volume 57
container_issue 3
container_start_page 411
op_container_end_page 430
_version_ 1802642778925039616