Coarse‐Scale Distribution Surveys and Occurrence Probability Modeling for Wolverine in Interior Alaska

• Published in: The Journal of Wildlife Management
• Main Authors: Gardner, Craig L., Lawler, James P., Hoef, Jay M. Ver, Magoun, Audrey J., Kellie, Kalin A.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2010
• Subjects: Canada; Gulo gulo; Alaska
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2009-386; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2009-386

ABSTRACT We determined wolverine ( Gulo gulo ) distribution and occurrence probabilities using aerial surveys and hierarchical spatial modeling in a 180,000‐km 2 portion of Interior Alaska, USA. During 8 February‐12 March 2006, we surveyed 149 of 180 1,000‐km 2 sample units for wolverine tracks. We observed wolverine tracks in 99 (66.4%) sample units. Wolverine detection probability was ≥69% throughout the survey period. Posterior occurrence probabilities of whether a wolverine track occurred in a sample unit was dependent on survey timing, number of transects flown, number of neighboring sample units with detected tracks, percentage of the sample unit with elevation ≤305 m, and human influences. Our model indicated strong evidence of occurrence (>0.80) in 72% of the 180 survey units, strong evidence of absence (<0.20) in 12%, and weak evidence of occurrence or absence (0.20–0.80) in 16%. Wolverine area of occupancy made up 83% of the study area. Simulations illustrated that 2–4 survey routes were necessary for the survey technique to provide strong evidence of wolverine presence or absence in Interior Alaska if a track was not identified along the first route. The necessary number of survey routes depends on the occurrence probability in a sample unit. We provided managers with a map of wolverine distribution in Interior Alaska and an efficient and lower‐cost method to detect coarse‐scale changes in wolverine distribution. Our technique was effective in both Interior Alaska and Ontario, Canada, suggesting it would be effective throughout most of the boreal forest range of wolverines where tracks can be readily observed from the air. The technique requires a certain skill level in recognizing tracks; it is essential that tracks are identified correctly and training may be necessary depending on surveyor experience.