Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia

ABSTRACT In many urban metropolitan areas, resident Canada goose ( Branta canadensis ) populations have grown to nuisance levels in spite of increasing harvest opportunity. To document differences in demographic parameters between urban and rural geese, I estimated probabilities of survival, recaptu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Author: BALKCOM, GREGORY D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2009-007
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2009-007
id crwiley:10.2193/2009-007
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2193/2009-007 2024-04-14T08:09:57+00:00 Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia BALKCOM, GREGORY D. 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2009-007 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2009-007 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 74, issue 1, page 120-123 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 Nature and Landscape Conservation Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Nature and Landscape Conservation Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2010 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2193/2009-007 2024-03-19T10:51:00Z ABSTRACT In many urban metropolitan areas, resident Canada goose ( Branta canadensis ) populations have grown to nuisance levels in spite of increasing harvest opportunity. To document differences in demographic parameters between urban and rural geese, I estimated probabilities of survival, recapture, recovery, and fidelity for adult resident Canada geese between 2001 and 2006 using banding, live recapture, and dead recovery data from 2 distinct banding locations in Georgia, USA. Adult survival rates were higher for urban geese (0.958, SE = 0.020) than for rural geese (0.682, SE = 0.049). Using estimated recovery probabilities of 0.505 (SE = 0.107) for urban and 0.463 (SE = 0.045) for rural geese, along with current estimates of crippling loss and reporting rate, the estimated mean harvest rate for urban geese was 0.029 (SE = 0.006) and for rural geese was 0.202 (SE = 0.020). Fidelity rates were similar between urban (0.730, SE = 0.033) and rural geese (0.713, SE = 0.069). This information suggests that urban segments of the Canada goose population have substantially higher survival than rural geese and are harvested at a very low rate, and that liberalizing hunting regulations may have little impact on Georgia's urban goose population. Wildlife managers may need to consider options other than sport hunting to control nuisance goose populations in urban areas. Article in Journal/Newspaper Branta canadensis Canada Goose Wiley Online Library Canada The Journal of Wildlife Management 74 1 120 123
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
BALKCOM, GREGORY D.
Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia
topic_facet Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description ABSTRACT In many urban metropolitan areas, resident Canada goose ( Branta canadensis ) populations have grown to nuisance levels in spite of increasing harvest opportunity. To document differences in demographic parameters between urban and rural geese, I estimated probabilities of survival, recapture, recovery, and fidelity for adult resident Canada geese between 2001 and 2006 using banding, live recapture, and dead recovery data from 2 distinct banding locations in Georgia, USA. Adult survival rates were higher for urban geese (0.958, SE = 0.020) than for rural geese (0.682, SE = 0.049). Using estimated recovery probabilities of 0.505 (SE = 0.107) for urban and 0.463 (SE = 0.045) for rural geese, along with current estimates of crippling loss and reporting rate, the estimated mean harvest rate for urban geese was 0.029 (SE = 0.006) and for rural geese was 0.202 (SE = 0.020). Fidelity rates were similar between urban (0.730, SE = 0.033) and rural geese (0.713, SE = 0.069). This information suggests that urban segments of the Canada goose population have substantially higher survival than rural geese and are harvested at a very low rate, and that liberalizing hunting regulations may have little impact on Georgia's urban goose population. Wildlife managers may need to consider options other than sport hunting to control nuisance goose populations in urban areas.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author BALKCOM, GREGORY D.
author_facet BALKCOM, GREGORY D.
author_sort BALKCOM, GREGORY D.
title Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia
title_short Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia
title_full Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia
title_fullStr Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia
title_sort demographic parameters of rural and urban adult resident canada geese in georgia
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2010
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2009-007
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2009-007
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Branta canadensis
Canada Goose
genre_facet Branta canadensis
Canada Goose
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 74, issue 1, page 120-123
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2193/2009-007
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 120
op_container_end_page 123
_version_ 1796307435785289728