Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone

ABSTRACT The United States Fish and Wildlife Service uses counts of unduplicated female grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) with cubs‐of‐the‐year to establish limits of sustainable mortality in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA. Sightings are clustered into observations of unique bears based on an e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: SCHWARTZ, CHARLES C., HAROLDSON, MARK A., CHERRY, STEVE, KEATING, KIM A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2007-259
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2007-259
id crwiley:10.2193/2007-259
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2193/2007-259 2024-10-13T14:11:15+00:00 Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone SCHWARTZ, CHARLES C. HAROLDSON, MARK A. CHERRY, STEVE KEATING, KIM A. 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2007-259 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2007-259 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 72, issue 2, page 543-554 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2008 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-259 2024-09-23T04:36:33Z ABSTRACT The United States Fish and Wildlife Service uses counts of unduplicated female grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) with cubs‐of‐the‐year to establish limits of sustainable mortality in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA. Sightings are clustered into observations of unique bears based on an empirically derived rule set. The method has never been tested or verified. To evaluate the rule set, we used data from radiocollared females obtained during 1975–2004 to simulate populations under varying densities, distributions, and sighting frequencies. We tested individual rules and rule‐set performance, using custom software to apply the rule‐set and cluster sightings. Results indicated most rules were violated to some degree, and rule‐based clustering consistently underestimated the minimum number of females and total population size derived from a nonparametric estimator (Chao2). We conclude that the current rule set returns conservative estimates, but with minor improvements, counts of unduplicated females‐with‐cubs can serve as a reasonable index of population size useful for establishing annual mortality limits. For the Yellowstone population, the index is more practical and cost‐effective than capture‐mark‐recapture using either DNA hair snagging or aerial surveys with radiomarked bears. The method has useful application in other ecosystems, but we recommend rules used to distinguish unique females be adapted to local conditions and tested. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Wiley Online Library The Journal of Wildlife Management 72 2 543 554
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description ABSTRACT The United States Fish and Wildlife Service uses counts of unduplicated female grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) with cubs‐of‐the‐year to establish limits of sustainable mortality in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA. Sightings are clustered into observations of unique bears based on an empirically derived rule set. The method has never been tested or verified. To evaluate the rule set, we used data from radiocollared females obtained during 1975–2004 to simulate populations under varying densities, distributions, and sighting frequencies. We tested individual rules and rule‐set performance, using custom software to apply the rule‐set and cluster sightings. Results indicated most rules were violated to some degree, and rule‐based clustering consistently underestimated the minimum number of females and total population size derived from a nonparametric estimator (Chao2). We conclude that the current rule set returns conservative estimates, but with minor improvements, counts of unduplicated females‐with‐cubs can serve as a reasonable index of population size useful for establishing annual mortality limits. For the Yellowstone population, the index is more practical and cost‐effective than capture‐mark‐recapture using either DNA hair snagging or aerial surveys with radiomarked bears. The method has useful application in other ecosystems, but we recommend rules used to distinguish unique females be adapted to local conditions and tested.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author SCHWARTZ, CHARLES C.
HAROLDSON, MARK A.
CHERRY, STEVE
KEATING, KIM A.
spellingShingle SCHWARTZ, CHARLES C.
HAROLDSON, MARK A.
CHERRY, STEVE
KEATING, KIM A.
Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone
author_facet SCHWARTZ, CHARLES C.
HAROLDSON, MARK A.
CHERRY, STEVE
KEATING, KIM A.
author_sort SCHWARTZ, CHARLES C.
title Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone
title_short Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone
title_full Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone
title_fullStr Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Rules to Distinguish Unique Female Grizzly Bears With Cubs in Yellowstone
title_sort evaluation of rules to distinguish unique female grizzly bears with cubs in yellowstone
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2007-259
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2007-259
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 72, issue 2, page 543-554
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-259
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 72
container_issue 2
container_start_page 543
op_container_end_page 554
_version_ 1812818911989596160