Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate?

Abstract: To estimate wolf ( Canis lupus ) kill rates from fine‐scale movement patterns, we followed adult wolves in 3 territories of the Scandinavian wolf population using Global Positioning Systems (GPS) during the winters of 2001–2003. The resulting 6 datasets of 62–84 study days gave a total of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: ZIMMERMANN, BARBARA, WABAKKEN, PETTER, SAND, HÅKAN, PEDERSEN, HANS C., LIBERG, OLOF
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2006-306
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2006-306
id crwiley:10.2193/2006-306
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2193/2006-306 2024-09-15T17:36:15+00:00 Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate? ZIMMERMANN, BARBARA WABAKKEN, PETTER SAND, HÅKAN PEDERSEN, HANS C. LIBERG, OLOF 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2006-306 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2006-306 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 71, issue 4, page 1177-1182 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2007 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-306 2024-07-09T04:11:09Z Abstract: To estimate wolf ( Canis lupus ) kill rates from fine‐scale movement patterns, we followed adult wolves in 3 territories of the Scandinavian wolf population using Global Positioning Systems (GPS) during the winters of 2001–2003. The resulting 6 datasets of 62–84 study days gave a total of 8,747 hourly GPS positions. We visited clusters of positions in the field on average 8.8 days after positioning and found moose ( Alces alces ) killed by wolves during the study period on 74 (8%) of the 953 clusters. The number of positions and visits to a cluster, their interaction, and the proportion of afternoon positions were significant fixed effects in mixed logistic‐regression models predicting the probability of a cluster containing a wolf‐killed moose. The models, however, displayed a poor goodness‐of‐fit and were not a suitable tool for estimating kill rates from positioning data alone. They might be used to reduce fieldwork by excluding unlikely clusters, although the reduction was not substantial. We discuss proximate factors (i.e., human disturbance and access to prey) as well as ultimate factors (i.e., social organization, intra‐guild dominance, and litter size) as potential causes of the observed high temporal and spatial variation in prey‐handling. For similar future kill‐rate studies, we recommend increasing field efforts and shortening positioning intervals. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canis lupus Wiley Online Library The Journal of Wildlife Management 71 4 1177 1182
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract: To estimate wolf ( Canis lupus ) kill rates from fine‐scale movement patterns, we followed adult wolves in 3 territories of the Scandinavian wolf population using Global Positioning Systems (GPS) during the winters of 2001–2003. The resulting 6 datasets of 62–84 study days gave a total of 8,747 hourly GPS positions. We visited clusters of positions in the field on average 8.8 days after positioning and found moose ( Alces alces ) killed by wolves during the study period on 74 (8%) of the 953 clusters. The number of positions and visits to a cluster, their interaction, and the proportion of afternoon positions were significant fixed effects in mixed logistic‐regression models predicting the probability of a cluster containing a wolf‐killed moose. The models, however, displayed a poor goodness‐of‐fit and were not a suitable tool for estimating kill rates from positioning data alone. They might be used to reduce fieldwork by excluding unlikely clusters, although the reduction was not substantial. We discuss proximate factors (i.e., human disturbance and access to prey) as well as ultimate factors (i.e., social organization, intra‐guild dominance, and litter size) as potential causes of the observed high temporal and spatial variation in prey‐handling. For similar future kill‐rate studies, we recommend increasing field efforts and shortening positioning intervals.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author ZIMMERMANN, BARBARA
WABAKKEN, PETTER
SAND, HÅKAN
PEDERSEN, HANS C.
LIBERG, OLOF
spellingShingle ZIMMERMANN, BARBARA
WABAKKEN, PETTER
SAND, HÅKAN
PEDERSEN, HANS C.
LIBERG, OLOF
Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate?
author_facet ZIMMERMANN, BARBARA
WABAKKEN, PETTER
SAND, HÅKAN
PEDERSEN, HANS C.
LIBERG, OLOF
author_sort ZIMMERMANN, BARBARA
title Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate?
title_short Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate?
title_full Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate?
title_fullStr Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate?
title_full_unstemmed Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate?
title_sort wolf movement patterns: a key to estimation of kill rate?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2006-306
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2006-306
genre Alces alces
Canis lupus
genre_facet Alces alces
Canis lupus
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 71, issue 4, page 1177-1182
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-306
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 71
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1177
op_container_end_page 1182
_version_ 1810488201587982336