Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range

Abstract: Numerous studies have documented how prey may use antipredator strategies to reduce the risk of predation from a single predator. However, when a recolonizing predator enters an already complex predator—prey system, specific antipredator behaviors may conflict and avoidance of one predator...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: ATWOOD, TODD C., GESE, ERIC M., KUNKEL, KYRAN E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2006-102
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2006-102
id crwiley:10.2193/2006-102
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2193/2006-102 2024-09-15T18:01:20+00:00 Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range ATWOOD, TODD C. GESE, ERIC M. KUNKEL, KYRAN E. 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2006-102 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2006-102 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 71, issue 4, page 1098-1106 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2007 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-102 2024-08-13T04:13:43Z Abstract: Numerous studies have documented how prey may use antipredator strategies to reduce the risk of predation from a single predator. However, when a recolonizing predator enters an already complex predator—prey system, specific antipredator behaviors may conflict and avoidance of one predator may enhance vulnerability to another. We studied the patterns of prey selection by recolonizing wolves ( Canis lupus ) and cougars ( Puma concolor ) in response to prey resource selection in the northern Madison Range, Montana, USA. Elk ( Cervus elaphus ) were the primary prey for wolves, and mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) were the primary prey for cougars, but elk made up an increasingly greater proportion of cougar kills annually. Although both predators preyed disproportionately on male elk, wolves were most likely to prey on males in poor physical condition. Although we found that the predators partitioned hunting habitats, structural complexity at wolf kill sites increased over time, whereas complexity of cougar kill sites decreased. We concluded that shifts by prey to structurally complex refugia were attempts by formerly naïve prey to lessen predation risk from wolves; nevertheless, shifting to more structurally complex refugia might have made prey more vulnerable to cougars. After a change in predator exposure, use of refugia may represent a compromise to minimize overall risk. As agencies formulate management strategies relative to wolf recolonization, the potential for interactive predation effects (i.e., facilitation or antagonism) should be considered. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Wiley Online Library The Journal of Wildlife Management 71 4 1098 1106
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract: Numerous studies have documented how prey may use antipredator strategies to reduce the risk of predation from a single predator. However, when a recolonizing predator enters an already complex predator—prey system, specific antipredator behaviors may conflict and avoidance of one predator may enhance vulnerability to another. We studied the patterns of prey selection by recolonizing wolves ( Canis lupus ) and cougars ( Puma concolor ) in response to prey resource selection in the northern Madison Range, Montana, USA. Elk ( Cervus elaphus ) were the primary prey for wolves, and mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) were the primary prey for cougars, but elk made up an increasingly greater proportion of cougar kills annually. Although both predators preyed disproportionately on male elk, wolves were most likely to prey on males in poor physical condition. Although we found that the predators partitioned hunting habitats, structural complexity at wolf kill sites increased over time, whereas complexity of cougar kill sites decreased. We concluded that shifts by prey to structurally complex refugia were attempts by formerly naïve prey to lessen predation risk from wolves; nevertheless, shifting to more structurally complex refugia might have made prey more vulnerable to cougars. After a change in predator exposure, use of refugia may represent a compromise to minimize overall risk. As agencies formulate management strategies relative to wolf recolonization, the potential for interactive predation effects (i.e., facilitation or antagonism) should be considered.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author ATWOOD, TODD C.
GESE, ERIC M.
KUNKEL, KYRAN E.
spellingShingle ATWOOD, TODD C.
GESE, ERIC M.
KUNKEL, KYRAN E.
Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range
author_facet ATWOOD, TODD C.
GESE, ERIC M.
KUNKEL, KYRAN E.
author_sort ATWOOD, TODD C.
title Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range
title_short Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range
title_full Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range
title_fullStr Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range
title_sort comparative patterns of predation by cougars and recolonizing wolves in montana's madison range
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2006-102
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2006-102
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 71, issue 4, page 1098-1106
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-102
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 71
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1098
op_container_end_page 1106
_version_ 1810438485845213184