Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California

ABSTRACT We investigated habitat selection using single‐ and mixed‐scale modeling at 2 spatial scales, stand and home range, by the only known population of American martens ( Martes americana ) remaining in the historical range of the Humboldt subspecies ( M. a. humboldtensis ) in California, USA....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: SLAUSON, KEITH M., ZIELINSKI, WILLIAM J., HAYES, JOHN P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2004-332
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2004-332
_version_ 1821579744552943616
author SLAUSON, KEITH M.
ZIELINSKI, WILLIAM J.
HAYES, JOHN P.
author_facet SLAUSON, KEITH M.
ZIELINSKI, WILLIAM J.
HAYES, JOHN P.
author_sort SLAUSON, KEITH M.
collection Wiley Online Library
container_issue 2
container_start_page 458
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 71
description ABSTRACT We investigated habitat selection using single‐ and mixed‐scale modeling at 2 spatial scales, stand and home range, by the only known population of American martens ( Martes americana ) remaining in the historical range of the Humboldt subspecies ( M. a. humboldtensis ) in California, USA. During 2000 and 2001, we sampled a 12 times 14 grid with 2‐km spacing, using 2 sooted track plates at each grid point. We detected martens at 26 of the 159 grid points. We used resource selection probability functions and an information‐theoretic method to model habitat at detection locations. At the stand scale, martens selected conifer‐dominated stands with dense, spatially extensive shrub cover (x̄ = 74% cover, SE = 4) in the oldest developmental stage. At the home‐range scale, martens selected the largest available patches (x̄ = 181 ha, SE = 14) of old‐growth, old‐growth and late‐mature, or serpentine habitat. Mixed‐scale models revealed that habitat characteristics from both scales best explained marten occurrence compared to one scale alone. Dense, spatially extensive shrub cover is a key habitat element for martens in coastal forests. Dense shrubs provide refuge from predators, cover for prey, and may also deter larger‐bodied competitors. Managers can increase the likelihood of marten population persistence and encourage expansion in coastal forests by maintaining and restoring late‐mature and old‐growth, conifer‐dominated forests with dense shrub cover in large, contiguous patches.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Martes americana
genre_facet Martes americana
id crwiley:10.2193/2004-332
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id crwiley
op_container_end_page 468
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2193/2004-332
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 71, issue 2, page 458-468
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
publishDate 2007
publisher Wiley
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.2193/2004-332 2025-01-16T23:02:59+00:00 Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California SLAUSON, KEITH M. ZIELINSKI, WILLIAM J. HAYES, JOHN P. 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2004-332 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2004-332 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 71, issue 2, page 458-468 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2007 crwiley https://doi.org/10.2193/2004-332 2024-08-30T04:11:17Z ABSTRACT We investigated habitat selection using single‐ and mixed‐scale modeling at 2 spatial scales, stand and home range, by the only known population of American martens ( Martes americana ) remaining in the historical range of the Humboldt subspecies ( M. a. humboldtensis ) in California, USA. During 2000 and 2001, we sampled a 12 times 14 grid with 2‐km spacing, using 2 sooted track plates at each grid point. We detected martens at 26 of the 159 grid points. We used resource selection probability functions and an information‐theoretic method to model habitat at detection locations. At the stand scale, martens selected conifer‐dominated stands with dense, spatially extensive shrub cover (x̄ = 74% cover, SE = 4) in the oldest developmental stage. At the home‐range scale, martens selected the largest available patches (x̄ = 181 ha, SE = 14) of old‐growth, old‐growth and late‐mature, or serpentine habitat. Mixed‐scale models revealed that habitat characteristics from both scales best explained marten occurrence compared to one scale alone. Dense, spatially extensive shrub cover is a key habitat element for martens in coastal forests. Dense shrubs provide refuge from predators, cover for prey, and may also deter larger‐bodied competitors. Managers can increase the likelihood of marten population persistence and encourage expansion in coastal forests by maintaining and restoring late‐mature and old‐growth, conifer‐dominated forests with dense shrub cover in large, contiguous patches. Article in Journal/Newspaper Martes americana Wiley Online Library The Journal of Wildlife Management 71 2 458 468
spellingShingle SLAUSON, KEITH M.
ZIELINSKI, WILLIAM J.
HAYES, JOHN P.
Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California
title Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California
title_full Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California
title_fullStr Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California
title_full_unstemmed Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California
title_short Habitat Selection by American Martens in Coastal California
title_sort habitat selection by american martens in coastal california
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2004-332
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.2193%2F2004-332