Increased sensitivity and variability of phytotoxicity responses in Arctic soils to a reference toxicant, boric acid

• Published in: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
• Main Authors: Anaka, Alison, Wickstrom, Mark, Siciliano, Steven Douglas
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2008
• Subjects: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis; Environmental Chemistry; Arctic; Canada
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/07-405.1; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1897%2F07-405.1; https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1897/07-405.1

Abstract Industrial and human activities in the Arctic regions may pose a risk to terrestrial Arctic ecosystem functions. One of the most common terrestrial toxicological end points, primary productivity, typically is assessed using a plant phytotoxicity test. Because of cryoturbation, a soil mixing process common in polar regions, we hypothesized that phytotoxicity test results in Arctic soils would be highly variable compared to other terrestrial ecosystems. The variability associated with phytotoxicity tests was evaluated using Environment Canada's standardized plant toxicity test in three cryoturbated soils from Canada's Arctic exposed to a reference toxicant, boric acid. Northern wheatgrass ( Elymus lanceolatus ) not only was more sensitive to toxicants in Arctic soils, its response to toxicants was more variable compared to that in temperate soils. The phytotoxicity of boric acid in cryosols was much greater than commonly reported in other soils, with a boric acid concentration of less than 150 μg/g soil needed to inhibit root and shoot growth by 20%. Large variability also was found in the phytotoxicity test results, with coefficients of variation for 10 samples ranging from 160 to 79%. The increased toxicity of boric acid in cryosols and variability in test response was not explained by soil properties. Based on our admittedly limited data set of three different Arctic soils, we recommend that more than 30 samples be taken from each control and potentially impacted area to accurately assess contaminant effects at sites in northern Canada. Such intensive sampling will insure that false‐negative results for toxicant impacts in Arctic soils are minimized.