Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness

Expert collection of specimens in the field and further determination of species is the best method for determining species richness. However, the relative paucity of botanists working in Antarctica makes this approach impractical for broad‐scale surveys of Antarctic floral biodiversity. Lichens are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology
Main Authors: Casanovas, Paula, Lynch, Heather J., Fagan, William F., Naveen, Ron
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1890%2F13-0237.1
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890/13-0237.1
id crwiley:10.1890/13-0237.1
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1890/13-0237.1 2024-04-28T08:01:10+00:00 Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness Ecological Archives E094‐194 Casanovas, Paula Lynch, Heather J. Fagan, William F. Naveen, Ron 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1890%2F13-0237.1 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890/13-0237.1 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ecology volume 94, issue 9, page 2110-2110 ISSN 0012-9658 1939-9170 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2013 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1 2024-04-08T06:56:46Z Expert collection of specimens in the field and further determination of species is the best method for determining species richness. However, the relative paucity of botanists working in Antarctica makes this approach impractical for broad‐scale surveys of Antarctic floral biodiversity. Lichens are the dominant macrophytes of terrestrial Antarctica and, as such, play a fundamental part of the ice‐free terrestrial ecosystem. Many distinct ice‐free terrestrial habitats in the Antarctic are not represented in the current network of Antarctic protected areas. However, it is difficult to identify appropriate areas for conservation because comprehensive data on distributional patterns of Antarctic flora are not available, and existing data for most Antarctic lichen species are not compiled. Consequently, cost‐effective survey methods and surrogates for the prediction of species richness are needed to accelerate assessments of local biodiversity and help select areas for conservation. A combination of a photographic “citizen scientist” approach for the collection of data and the use of parataxonomic unit (PU) richness as a surrogate for species richness, might be a possible solution to effectively collect preliminary information and rapidly build databases on species diversity. We have developed a database and gathered photographic information on lichen occurrences for sites that are frequently visited by tourists. We tested the identification capabilities with a reference data set of Antarctic lichen images from the U.S. National Herbarium. We showed that all species used in this test can be detected and that, for 74% of the images, all classifiers were able to identify the genus of the specimen. Twenty‐nine sites were photographically surveyed by researchers and tourists between 2009/2010 and 2011/2012 in the Antarctic Peninsula region. We estimated PU richness as a proxy for species richness for each of the 29 sites surveyed and provide two examples of potential applications. These surveys provide preliminary ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica Wiley Online Library Ecology 94 9 2110 2110
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Casanovas, Paula
Lynch, Heather J.
Fagan, William F.
Naveen, Ron
Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
topic_facet Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Expert collection of specimens in the field and further determination of species is the best method for determining species richness. However, the relative paucity of botanists working in Antarctica makes this approach impractical for broad‐scale surveys of Antarctic floral biodiversity. Lichens are the dominant macrophytes of terrestrial Antarctica and, as such, play a fundamental part of the ice‐free terrestrial ecosystem. Many distinct ice‐free terrestrial habitats in the Antarctic are not represented in the current network of Antarctic protected areas. However, it is difficult to identify appropriate areas for conservation because comprehensive data on distributional patterns of Antarctic flora are not available, and existing data for most Antarctic lichen species are not compiled. Consequently, cost‐effective survey methods and surrogates for the prediction of species richness are needed to accelerate assessments of local biodiversity and help select areas for conservation. A combination of a photographic “citizen scientist” approach for the collection of data and the use of parataxonomic unit (PU) richness as a surrogate for species richness, might be a possible solution to effectively collect preliminary information and rapidly build databases on species diversity. We have developed a database and gathered photographic information on lichen occurrences for sites that are frequently visited by tourists. We tested the identification capabilities with a reference data set of Antarctic lichen images from the U.S. National Herbarium. We showed that all species used in this test can be detected and that, for 74% of the images, all classifiers were able to identify the genus of the specimen. Twenty‐nine sites were photographically surveyed by researchers and tourists between 2009/2010 and 2011/2012 in the Antarctic Peninsula region. We estimated PU richness as a proxy for species richness for each of the 29 sites surveyed and provide two examples of potential applications. These surveys provide preliminary ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Casanovas, Paula
Lynch, Heather J.
Fagan, William F.
Naveen, Ron
author_facet Casanovas, Paula
Lynch, Heather J.
Fagan, William F.
Naveen, Ron
author_sort Casanovas, Paula
title Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_short Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_full Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_fullStr Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_full_unstemmed Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_sort understanding lichen diversity on the antarctic peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1890%2F13-0237.1
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890/13-0237.1
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
op_source Ecology
volume 94, issue 9, page 2110-2110
ISSN 0012-9658 1939-9170
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1
container_title Ecology
container_volume 94
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2110
op_container_end_page 2110
_version_ 1797573038071349248