A Bayesian hierarchical model of Antarctic fur seal foraging and pup growth related to sea ice and prey abundance

• Published in: Ecological Applications
• Main Authors: Hiruki-Raring, Lisa M., Hoef, Jay M. Ver, Boveng, Peter L., Bengtson, John L.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2012
• Subjects: Antarc*; Antarctic; Antarctic Fur Seal; Antarctic Fur Seals; Antarctica; Arctocephalus gazella; Sea ice; Seal Island
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/11-0102.1; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1890%2F11-0102.1; https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890/11-0102.1

We created a Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM) to investigate ecosystem relationships between the physical ecosystem (sea ice extent), a prey measure (krill density), predator behaviors (diving and foraging effort of female Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella , with pups) and predator characteristics (mass of maternal fur seals and pups). We collected data on Antarctic fur seals from 1987/1988 to 1994/1995 at Seal Island, Antarctica. The BHM allowed us to link together predators and prey into a model that uses all the data efficiently and accounts for major sources of uncertainty. Based on the literature, we made hypotheses about the relationships in the model, which we compared with the model outcome after fitting the BHM. For each BHM parameter, we calculated the mean of the posterior density and the 95% credible interval. Our model confirmed others' findings that increased sea ice was related to increased krill density. Higher krill density led to reduced dive intensity of maternal fur seals, as measured by dive depth and duration, and to less time spent foraging by maternal fur seals. Heavier maternal fur seals and lower maternal foraging effort resulted in heavier pups at 22 d. No relationship was found between krill density and maternal mass, or between maternal mass and foraging effort on pup growth rates between 22 and 85 days of age. Maternal mass may have reflected environmental conditions prior to the pup provisioning season, rather than summer prey densities. Maternal mass and foraging effort were not related to pup growth rates between 22 and 85 d, possibly indicating that food was not limiting, food sources other than krill were being used, or differences occurred before pups reached age 22 d.