Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary
Abstract Fisheries for American eel Anguilla rostrata occur mostly in estuaries, yet eel abundance in large estuaries is poorly understood and the methods for estimating eel density underdeveloped. During 1997–1999, mark–recapture experiments were conducted for six consecutive days at six sites span...
Published in: | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1 https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577/T02-100.1 |
id |
crwiley:10.1577/t02-100.1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1577/t02-100.1 2024-09-15T17:35:43+00:00 Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary Morrison, W. E. Secor, D. H. 2004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1 https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577/T02-100.1 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Transactions of the American Fisheries Society volume 133, issue 4, page 896-910 ISSN 0002-8487 1548-8659 journal-article 2004 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1 2024-07-09T04:10:08Z Abstract Fisheries for American eel Anguilla rostrata occur mostly in estuaries, yet eel abundance in large estuaries is poorly understood and the methods for estimating eel density underdeveloped. During 1997–1999, mark–recapture experiments were conducted for six consecutive days at six sites spanning the 250‐km tidal portion of the Hudson River estuary, New York. Each experiment comprised 36 baited eel traps arrayed at 200‐m intervals over 144‐ha sampling sites. Estimates of local density were complicated by eel behavior, including trap‐shy responses to marking and immigration into the experimental grid in response to bait attraction. We compared two open‐population models, both modified Peterson methods: Jolly–Seber and a model created to account for eel behavior termed the mean recapture model (MRM). The biases in model outputs in response to trap‐shy behavior and immigration were analyzed through simulations; the MRM showed less bias (−13%) than the Jolly–Seber model (+36%). Density estimates for the sampled regions ranged from 2 to 18 eels/ha for MRM and from 3 to 24 eels/ha for the Jolly–Seber model. The lowest density (1.6 eels/ha) was estimated for Albany (river km 240), but all other sites were estimated to have similar densities (5–18 eels/ha). The mean local density in the Hudson River estuary, 9.5 eels/ha, was much lower than those estimated for other systems. An overall abundance of 118,000 was calculated for Hudson River estuary eels larger than 30 cm (total length) at depths of 2–10 m. Article in Journal/Newspaper Albany River Wiley Online Library Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133 4 896 910 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
description |
Abstract Fisheries for American eel Anguilla rostrata occur mostly in estuaries, yet eel abundance in large estuaries is poorly understood and the methods for estimating eel density underdeveloped. During 1997–1999, mark–recapture experiments were conducted for six consecutive days at six sites spanning the 250‐km tidal portion of the Hudson River estuary, New York. Each experiment comprised 36 baited eel traps arrayed at 200‐m intervals over 144‐ha sampling sites. Estimates of local density were complicated by eel behavior, including trap‐shy responses to marking and immigration into the experimental grid in response to bait attraction. We compared two open‐population models, both modified Peterson methods: Jolly–Seber and a model created to account for eel behavior termed the mean recapture model (MRM). The biases in model outputs in response to trap‐shy behavior and immigration were analyzed through simulations; the MRM showed less bias (−13%) than the Jolly–Seber model (+36%). Density estimates for the sampled regions ranged from 2 to 18 eels/ha for MRM and from 3 to 24 eels/ha for the Jolly–Seber model. The lowest density (1.6 eels/ha) was estimated for Albany (river km 240), but all other sites were estimated to have similar densities (5–18 eels/ha). The mean local density in the Hudson River estuary, 9.5 eels/ha, was much lower than those estimated for other systems. An overall abundance of 118,000 was calculated for Hudson River estuary eels larger than 30 cm (total length) at depths of 2–10 m. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Morrison, W. E. Secor, D. H. |
spellingShingle |
Morrison, W. E. Secor, D. H. Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary |
author_facet |
Morrison, W. E. Secor, D. H. |
author_sort |
Morrison, W. E. |
title |
Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary |
title_short |
Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary |
title_full |
Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary |
title_fullStr |
Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary |
title_full_unstemmed |
Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary |
title_sort |
abundance of yellow‐phase american eels in the hudson river estuary |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1 https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577/T02-100.1 |
genre |
Albany River |
genre_facet |
Albany River |
op_source |
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society volume 133, issue 4, page 896-910 ISSN 0002-8487 1548-8659 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1 |
container_title |
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society |
container_volume |
133 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
896 |
op_container_end_page |
910 |
_version_ |
1810474975389286400 |