Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary

Abstract Fisheries for American eel Anguilla rostrata occur mostly in estuaries, yet eel abundance in large estuaries is poorly understood and the methods for estimating eel density underdeveloped. During 1997–1999, mark–recapture experiments were conducted for six consecutive days at six sites span...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Main Authors: Morrison, W. E., Secor, D. H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1
https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577/T02-100.1
id crwiley:10.1577/t02-100.1
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1577/t02-100.1 2024-09-15T17:35:43+00:00 Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary Morrison, W. E. Secor, D. H. 2004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1 https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577/T02-100.1 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Transactions of the American Fisheries Society volume 133, issue 4, page 896-910 ISSN 0002-8487 1548-8659 journal-article 2004 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1 2024-07-09T04:10:08Z Abstract Fisheries for American eel Anguilla rostrata occur mostly in estuaries, yet eel abundance in large estuaries is poorly understood and the methods for estimating eel density underdeveloped. During 1997–1999, mark–recapture experiments were conducted for six consecutive days at six sites spanning the 250‐km tidal portion of the Hudson River estuary, New York. Each experiment comprised 36 baited eel traps arrayed at 200‐m intervals over 144‐ha sampling sites. Estimates of local density were complicated by eel behavior, including trap‐shy responses to marking and immigration into the experimental grid in response to bait attraction. We compared two open‐population models, both modified Peterson methods: Jolly–Seber and a model created to account for eel behavior termed the mean recapture model (MRM). The biases in model outputs in response to trap‐shy behavior and immigration were analyzed through simulations; the MRM showed less bias (−13%) than the Jolly–Seber model (+36%). Density estimates for the sampled regions ranged from 2 to 18 eels/ha for MRM and from 3 to 24 eels/ha for the Jolly–Seber model. The lowest density (1.6 eels/ha) was estimated for Albany (river km 240), but all other sites were estimated to have similar densities (5–18 eels/ha). The mean local density in the Hudson River estuary, 9.5 eels/ha, was much lower than those estimated for other systems. An overall abundance of 118,000 was calculated for Hudson River estuary eels larger than 30 cm (total length) at depths of 2–10 m. Article in Journal/Newspaper Albany River Wiley Online Library Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133 4 896 910
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Fisheries for American eel Anguilla rostrata occur mostly in estuaries, yet eel abundance in large estuaries is poorly understood and the methods for estimating eel density underdeveloped. During 1997–1999, mark–recapture experiments were conducted for six consecutive days at six sites spanning the 250‐km tidal portion of the Hudson River estuary, New York. Each experiment comprised 36 baited eel traps arrayed at 200‐m intervals over 144‐ha sampling sites. Estimates of local density were complicated by eel behavior, including trap‐shy responses to marking and immigration into the experimental grid in response to bait attraction. We compared two open‐population models, both modified Peterson methods: Jolly–Seber and a model created to account for eel behavior termed the mean recapture model (MRM). The biases in model outputs in response to trap‐shy behavior and immigration were analyzed through simulations; the MRM showed less bias (−13%) than the Jolly–Seber model (+36%). Density estimates for the sampled regions ranged from 2 to 18 eels/ha for MRM and from 3 to 24 eels/ha for the Jolly–Seber model. The lowest density (1.6 eels/ha) was estimated for Albany (river km 240), but all other sites were estimated to have similar densities (5–18 eels/ha). The mean local density in the Hudson River estuary, 9.5 eels/ha, was much lower than those estimated for other systems. An overall abundance of 118,000 was calculated for Hudson River estuary eels larger than 30 cm (total length) at depths of 2–10 m.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Morrison, W. E.
Secor, D. H.
spellingShingle Morrison, W. E.
Secor, D. H.
Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary
author_facet Morrison, W. E.
Secor, D. H.
author_sort Morrison, W. E.
title Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary
title_short Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary
title_full Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary
title_fullStr Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary
title_full_unstemmed Abundance of Yellow‐Phase American Eels in the Hudson River Estuary
title_sort abundance of yellow‐phase american eels in the hudson river estuary
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2004
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1
https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577/T02-100.1
genre Albany River
genre_facet Albany River
op_source Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
volume 133, issue 4, page 896-910
ISSN 0002-8487 1548-8659
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1577/t02-100.1
container_title Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
container_volume 133
container_issue 4
container_start_page 896
op_container_end_page 910
_version_ 1810474975389286400