Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis

Abstract Crevasses—cracks in glaciers and ice sheets—pose a danger to polar researchers and glaciologists. We compare the capabilities of two techniques—geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis—to recognize open and hidden crevasses using high‐resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) generate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transactions in GIS
Main Authors: Ishalina, Olga T., Bliakharskii, Dmitrii P., Florinsky, Igor V.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12790
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tgis.12790
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/tgis.12790
id crwiley:10.1111/tgis.12790
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/tgis.12790 2024-09-15T17:42:10+00:00 Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis Ishalina, Olga T. Bliakharskii, Dmitrii P. Florinsky, Igor V. 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12790 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tgis.12790 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/tgis.12790 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Transactions in GIS volume 25, issue 5, page 2529-2552 ISSN 1361-1682 1467-9671 journal-article 2021 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12790 2024-07-30T04:21:14Z Abstract Crevasses—cracks in glaciers and ice sheets—pose a danger to polar researchers and glaciologists. We compare the capabilities of two techniques—geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis—to recognize open and hidden crevasses using high‐resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) generated from images collected by an unmanned aerial system (UAS). The first technique includes derivation of local morphometric variables; the second includes calculation of the Haralick texture features. The study area is represented by the first 30 km of a sledge route between the Progress and Vostok polar stations, East Antarctica. The UAS survey was performed by a Geoscan 201 Geodesy UAS. For the sledge route area, DEMs with resolutions of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 m were generated. Models of 12 morphometric variables and 11 texture features were derived from the DEMs. In terms of crevasse recognition, the most informative morphometric variable and texture feature was horizontal curvature and inverse difference moment, respectively. In most cases, derivation and mapping of these variables allow one to recognize crevasses wider than 3 m; narrower crevasses can be recognized for lengths from 500 m. For crevasse recognition, the geomorphometric modeling and the Haralick texture analysis can complement each other. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica East Antarctica Wiley Online Library Transactions in GIS 25 5 2529 2552
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Crevasses—cracks in glaciers and ice sheets—pose a danger to polar researchers and glaciologists. We compare the capabilities of two techniques—geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis—to recognize open and hidden crevasses using high‐resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) generated from images collected by an unmanned aerial system (UAS). The first technique includes derivation of local morphometric variables; the second includes calculation of the Haralick texture features. The study area is represented by the first 30 km of a sledge route between the Progress and Vostok polar stations, East Antarctica. The UAS survey was performed by a Geoscan 201 Geodesy UAS. For the sledge route area, DEMs with resolutions of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 m were generated. Models of 12 morphometric variables and 11 texture features were derived from the DEMs. In terms of crevasse recognition, the most informative morphometric variable and texture feature was horizontal curvature and inverse difference moment, respectively. In most cases, derivation and mapping of these variables allow one to recognize crevasses wider than 3 m; narrower crevasses can be recognized for lengths from 500 m. For crevasse recognition, the geomorphometric modeling and the Haralick texture analysis can complement each other.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ishalina, Olga T.
Bliakharskii, Dmitrii P.
Florinsky, Igor V.
spellingShingle Ishalina, Olga T.
Bliakharskii, Dmitrii P.
Florinsky, Igor V.
Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis
author_facet Ishalina, Olga T.
Bliakharskii, Dmitrii P.
Florinsky, Igor V.
author_sort Ishalina, Olga T.
title Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis
title_short Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis
title_full Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis
title_fullStr Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis
title_full_unstemmed Recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: Application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis
title_sort recognition of crevasses with high‐resolution digital elevation models: application of geomorphometric modeling and texture analysis
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12790
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tgis.12790
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/tgis.12790
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
East Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
East Antarctica
op_source Transactions in GIS
volume 25, issue 5, page 2529-2552
ISSN 1361-1682 1467-9671
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12790
container_title Transactions in GIS
container_volume 25
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2529
op_container_end_page 2552
_version_ 1810488619316543488