The utility of wing morphometrics for assigning type specimens to cryptic bumblebee species

• Published in: Systematic Entomology
• Main Authors: Gérard, Maxence, Martinet, Baptiste, Dehon, Manuel, Rasmont, Pierre, Williams, Paul H., Michez, Denis
• Other Authors: Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Commission
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: ALPINOBOMBUS
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/syen.12430; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fsyen.12430; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/syen.12430; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/syen.12430

Abstract Since the beginning of taxonomy, species have been described based on morphology, but the advent of using semio‐chemicals and genetics has led to the discovery of cryptic species (i.e. morphologically similar species). When a new cryptic species is described, earlier type specimens have to be re‐evaluated, although this process can be challenging as only nondestructive methods ought to be used in order to preserve the integrity of the type specimens. Methods should allow comparison with recently collected specimens clustered based on chemical, ethological and/or genetic traits with old specimens (i.e. type specimens) where only morphological traits are available. Here we develop a method based on geometric morphometric analyses of wing shape for a taxonomically challenging group of bumblebees, the subgenus Alpinobombus Skorikov. We consider nine monophyletic taxa (including several cryptic species) to assess the accuracy of this method to discriminate the taxa based on their wing shape and then to attribute type specimens using a leave‐one‐out cross‐validation procedure. We show that, for these bees, wing shape is taxon‐specific, except for two sister taxa for which the species status is still debated. Moreover, for most of the taxa, type specimens were correctly attributed with high posterior probabilities of attribution, except for a few type specimens corresponding to the same two sister taxa where taxa delimitation based on wing shape was previously the subject of discussion. Our study highlights the potential of geometric morphometric analyses to help in the re‐attribution of type specimens when the existence of cryptic species is revealed.