Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration

Commercial sources of native seed are often unavailable for ecological restoration projects or do not have a suitable provenance. Local collection of wild seed is an option, but it can be challenging to collect seed for a variety of species and set fair seed prices. Our aim was to quantify the relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Restoration Ecology
Main Authors: Rantala‐Sykes, Brittany, Campbell, Daniel
Other Authors: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12827
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Frec.12827
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rec.12827
id crwiley:10.1111/rec.12827
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/rec.12827 2024-10-13T14:11:00+00:00 Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration Rantala‐Sykes, Brittany Campbell, Daniel Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12827 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Frec.12827 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rec.12827 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Restoration Ecology volume 27, issue 1, page 9-14 ISSN 1061-2971 1526-100X journal-article 2018 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12827 2024-09-17T04:48:38Z Commercial sources of native seed are often unavailable for ecological restoration projects or do not have a suitable provenance. Local collection of wild seed is an option, but it can be challenging to collect seed for a variety of species and set fair seed prices. Our aim was to quantify the relative effort to collect, clean, store, and propagate seed to better prioritize species and assess the value of their seed. For 57 species native to the Canadian subarctic and typical of upland habitats, we evaluated 13 poorly correlated attributes in the field and lab or using the literature. For collection attributes, regional occurrence, local abundance, seed collection rate, and collection window were normally or log‐normally distributed. Most species were easy to identify and posed few collection obstacles. Cleaning effort was evenly distributed across species and the majority could be cleaned to more than 95% purity. We only encountered orthodox seed and most species had seed longevity exceeding a year. Seed viability mostly exceeded 80%, pre‐treatment requirements were evenly distributed and the majority of species could be germinated under standard conditions. We propose a standard worksheet, in which we assign relative effort scores to the distribution of each attribute. We illustrate this approach for the revegetation planning of a remote mine site. We also propose a seed lot certificate to ensure high seed quality. This tool can be applied to various restoration applications to assess relative effort, to plan and prioritize species for restoration projects and to help set fair seed pricing. Article in Journal/Newspaper Subarctic Wiley Online Library Restoration Ecology 27 1 9 14
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Commercial sources of native seed are often unavailable for ecological restoration projects or do not have a suitable provenance. Local collection of wild seed is an option, but it can be challenging to collect seed for a variety of species and set fair seed prices. Our aim was to quantify the relative effort to collect, clean, store, and propagate seed to better prioritize species and assess the value of their seed. For 57 species native to the Canadian subarctic and typical of upland habitats, we evaluated 13 poorly correlated attributes in the field and lab or using the literature. For collection attributes, regional occurrence, local abundance, seed collection rate, and collection window were normally or log‐normally distributed. Most species were easy to identify and posed few collection obstacles. Cleaning effort was evenly distributed across species and the majority could be cleaned to more than 95% purity. We only encountered orthodox seed and most species had seed longevity exceeding a year. Seed viability mostly exceeded 80%, pre‐treatment requirements were evenly distributed and the majority of species could be germinated under standard conditions. We propose a standard worksheet, in which we assign relative effort scores to the distribution of each attribute. We illustrate this approach for the revegetation planning of a remote mine site. We also propose a seed lot certificate to ensure high seed quality. This tool can be applied to various restoration applications to assess relative effort, to plan and prioritize species for restoration projects and to help set fair seed pricing.
author2 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rantala‐Sykes, Brittany
Campbell, Daniel
spellingShingle Rantala‐Sykes, Brittany
Campbell, Daniel
Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration
author_facet Rantala‐Sykes, Brittany
Campbell, Daniel
author_sort Rantala‐Sykes, Brittany
title Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration
title_short Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration
title_full Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration
title_fullStr Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration
title_full_unstemmed Should I pick that? A scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration
title_sort should i pick that? a scoring tool to prioritize and valuate native wild seed for restoration
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12827
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Frec.12827
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rec.12827
genre Subarctic
genre_facet Subarctic
op_source Restoration Ecology
volume 27, issue 1, page 9-14
ISSN 1061-2971 1526-100X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12827
container_title Restoration Ecology
container_volume 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
op_container_end_page 14
_version_ 1812818592971882496