Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success

The restoration of 4 partial stream barriers was evaluated in watersheds of Terra Nova National Park, Newfoundland, Canada from 2009 to 2011. Brook trout ( n = 462) were tagged and tracked moving through our study sites using passive‐integrated transponder telemetry and the restoration actions were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Restoration Ecology
Main Authors: Mahlum, Shad, Cote, David, Wiersma, Yolanda F., Pennell, Curtis, Adams, Blair
Other Authors: Centre for forest science and innovation, Parks Canada Action on the Ground Funding, AMEC Foster Wheeler, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12649
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Frec.12649
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rec.12649
id crwiley:10.1111/rec.12649
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/rec.12649 2024-09-09T19:53:46+00:00 Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success Mahlum, Shad Cote, David Wiersma, Yolanda F. Pennell, Curtis Adams, Blair Centre for forest science and innovation Parks Canada Action on the Ground Funding AMEC Foster Wheeler Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12649 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Frec.12649 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rec.12649 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Restoration Ecology volume 26, issue 5, page 952-963 ISSN 1061-2971 1526-100X journal-article 2017 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12649 2024-08-27T04:26:49Z The restoration of 4 partial stream barriers was evaluated in watersheds of Terra Nova National Park, Newfoundland, Canada from 2009 to 2011. Brook trout ( n = 462) were tagged and tracked moving through our study sites using passive‐integrated transponder telemetry and the restoration actions were assessed using 3 different measures: passage success rates; the range of passable flows; and the availability of passable flows. We considered the observed results within a before‐after‐control‐impact (BACI) design that included reference reaches and pre‐restoration observations. The conclusions of BACI analyses were also contrasted with those that would have been obtained from commonly used before‐after (B‐A) or control‐impact (C‐I) study designs. While the restoration actions changed hydrological conditions in a way that should facilitate fish passage, our biological measures indicated that success was variable across culverts and within culverts depending on the measure evaluated. Furthermore, the natural temporal and spatial variability of fish movements often resulted in different conclusions between the more robust BACI design and the more commonly used B‐A and C‐I designs. Our results demonstrate that restoration of partial barriers may not always yield dramatic improvements. Furthermore, without suitable controls, the chances of drawing false conclusions regarding restorations in temporally and spatially dynamic systems are substantial. Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Wiley Online Library Canada Restoration Ecology 26 5 952 963
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description The restoration of 4 partial stream barriers was evaluated in watersheds of Terra Nova National Park, Newfoundland, Canada from 2009 to 2011. Brook trout ( n = 462) were tagged and tracked moving through our study sites using passive‐integrated transponder telemetry and the restoration actions were assessed using 3 different measures: passage success rates; the range of passable flows; and the availability of passable flows. We considered the observed results within a before‐after‐control‐impact (BACI) design that included reference reaches and pre‐restoration observations. The conclusions of BACI analyses were also contrasted with those that would have been obtained from commonly used before‐after (B‐A) or control‐impact (C‐I) study designs. While the restoration actions changed hydrological conditions in a way that should facilitate fish passage, our biological measures indicated that success was variable across culverts and within culverts depending on the measure evaluated. Furthermore, the natural temporal and spatial variability of fish movements often resulted in different conclusions between the more robust BACI design and the more commonly used B‐A and C‐I designs. Our results demonstrate that restoration of partial barriers may not always yield dramatic improvements. Furthermore, without suitable controls, the chances of drawing false conclusions regarding restorations in temporally and spatially dynamic systems are substantial.
author2 Centre for forest science and innovation
Parks Canada Action on the Ground Funding
AMEC Foster Wheeler
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mahlum, Shad
Cote, David
Wiersma, Yolanda F.
Pennell, Curtis
Adams, Blair
spellingShingle Mahlum, Shad
Cote, David
Wiersma, Yolanda F.
Pennell, Curtis
Adams, Blair
Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success
author_facet Mahlum, Shad
Cote, David
Wiersma, Yolanda F.
Pennell, Curtis
Adams, Blair
author_sort Mahlum, Shad
title Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success
title_short Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success
title_full Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success
title_fullStr Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success
title_full_unstemmed Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success
title_sort does restoration work? it depends on how we measure success
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12649
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Frec.12649
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rec.12649
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source Restoration Ecology
volume 26, issue 5, page 952-963
ISSN 1061-2971 1526-100X
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12649
container_title Restoration Ecology
container_volume 26
container_issue 5
container_start_page 952
op_container_end_page 963
_version_ 1809923221110128640