Effects of temperature and water availability on light energy utilization in photosynthetic processes of Deschampsia antarctica

• Published in: Physiologia Plantarum
• Main Authors: Sáez, Patricia L., Rivera, Betsy K., Ramírez, Constanza F., Vallejos, Valentina, Cavieres, Lohengrin A., Corcuera, Luis J., Bravo, León A.
• Other Authors: Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2018
• Subjects: Cell Biology; Plant Science; Genetics; General Medicine; Physiology; Antarc*; Antarctic; Antarctica; King George Island; Lagotellerie Island
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12739; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fppl.12739; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ppl.12739

Regional climate change in Antarctica would favor the carbon assimilation of Antarctic vascular plants, since rising temperatures are approaching their photosynthetic optimum (10–19°C). This could be detrimental for photoprotection mechanisms, mainly those associated with thermal dissipation, making plants more susceptible to eventual drought predicted by climate change models. With the purpose to study the effect of temperature and water availability on light energy utilization and putative adjustments in photoprotective mechanisms of Deschampsia antarctica Desv., plants were collected from two Antarctic provenances: King George Island and Lagotellerie Island. Plants were cultivated at 5, 10 and 16°C under well‐watered (WW) and water‐deficit (WD, at 35% of the field capacity) conditions. Chlorophyll fluorescence, pigment content and de‐epoxidation state were evaluated. Regardless of provenances, D. antarctica showed similar morphological, biochemical and functional responses to growth temperature. Higher temperature triggered an increase in photochemical activity (i.e. electron transport rate and photochemical quenching), and a decrease in thermal dissipation capacity (i.e. lower xanthophyll pool, Chl a / b and β carotene/neoxanthin ratios). Leaf mass per unit area was reduced at higher temperature, and was only affected in plants exposed to WD at 16°C and exhibiting lower electron transport rate and amount of chlorophylls. D. antarctica is adapted to frequent freezing events, which may induce a form of physiological water stress. Photoprotective responses observed under WD contribute to maintain a stable photochemical activity. Thus, it is possible that short‐term temperature increases could favor the photochemical activity of this species. However, long‐term effects will depend on the magnitude of changes and the plant's ability to adjust to new growth temperature.