Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type

Summary The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth‐dependent plant–soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classificat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:New Phytologist
Main Authors: Blume‐Werry, Gesche, Dorrepaal, Ellen, Keuper, Frida, Kummu, Matti, Wild, Birgit, Weedon, James T.
Other Authors: H2020 European Research Council
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998
https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nph.18998
id crwiley:10.1111/nph.18998
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/nph.18998 2024-06-02T08:01:20+00:00 Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type Blume‐Werry, Gesche Dorrepaal, Ellen Keuper, Frida Kummu, Matti Wild, Birgit Weedon, James T. H2020 European Research Council 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998 https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nph.18998 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ New Phytologist volume 240, issue 2, page 502-514 ISSN 0028-646X 1469-8137 journal-article 2023 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998 2024-05-06T07:01:44Z Summary The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth‐dependent plant–soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classifications are suitable to estimate belowground attributes and their consequences, such as rooting depth distribution and its influence on carbon cycling. We performed a meta‐analysis of 55 published arctic rooting depth profiles, testing for differences both between distributions based on aboveground vegetation types (Graminoid, Wetland, Erect‐shrub, and Prostrate‐shrub tundra) and between ‘Root Profile Types’ for which we defined three representative and contrasting clusters. We further analyzed potential impacts of these different rooting depth distributions on rhizosphere priming‐induced carbon losses from tundra soils. Rooting depth distribution hardly differed between aboveground vegetation types but varied between Root Profile Types. Accordingly, modelled priming‐induced carbon emissions were similar between aboveground vegetation types when they were applied to the entire tundra, but ranged from 7.2 to 17.6 Pg C cumulative emissions until 2100 between individual Root Profile Types. Variations in rooting depth distribution are important for the circumpolar tundra carbon‐climate feedback but can currently not be inferred adequately from aboveground vegetation type classifications. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Tundra Wiley Online Library Arctic New Phytologist 240 2 502 514
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Summary The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth‐dependent plant–soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classifications are suitable to estimate belowground attributes and their consequences, such as rooting depth distribution and its influence on carbon cycling. We performed a meta‐analysis of 55 published arctic rooting depth profiles, testing for differences both between distributions based on aboveground vegetation types (Graminoid, Wetland, Erect‐shrub, and Prostrate‐shrub tundra) and between ‘Root Profile Types’ for which we defined three representative and contrasting clusters. We further analyzed potential impacts of these different rooting depth distributions on rhizosphere priming‐induced carbon losses from tundra soils. Rooting depth distribution hardly differed between aboveground vegetation types but varied between Root Profile Types. Accordingly, modelled priming‐induced carbon emissions were similar between aboveground vegetation types when they were applied to the entire tundra, but ranged from 7.2 to 17.6 Pg C cumulative emissions until 2100 between individual Root Profile Types. Variations in rooting depth distribution are important for the circumpolar tundra carbon‐climate feedback but can currently not be inferred adequately from aboveground vegetation type classifications.
author2 H2020 European Research Council
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Blume‐Werry, Gesche
Dorrepaal, Ellen
Keuper, Frida
Kummu, Matti
Wild, Birgit
Weedon, James T.
spellingShingle Blume‐Werry, Gesche
Dorrepaal, Ellen
Keuper, Frida
Kummu, Matti
Wild, Birgit
Weedon, James T.
Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
author_facet Blume‐Werry, Gesche
Dorrepaal, Ellen
Keuper, Frida
Kummu, Matti
Wild, Birgit
Weedon, James T.
author_sort Blume‐Werry, Gesche
title Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_short Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_full Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_fullStr Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_full_unstemmed Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_sort arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998
https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nph.18998
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
op_source New Phytologist
volume 240, issue 2, page 502-514
ISSN 0028-646X 1469-8137
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998
container_title New Phytologist
container_volume 240
container_issue 2
container_start_page 502
op_container_end_page 514
_version_ 1800745658973421568