Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds

Abstract Understanding cetacean distribution is essential for conservation planning and decision‐making, particularly in regions subject to rapid environmental changes. Nevertheless, information on their spatiotemporal distribution is commonly limited, especially from remote areas. Species distribut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Mammal Science
Main Authors: Duengen, Diandra, Burkhardt, Elke, El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mms.12943
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mms.12943
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/mms.12943
id crwiley:10.1111/mms.12943
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/mms.12943 2024-06-23T07:50:33+00:00 Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds Duengen, Diandra Burkhardt, Elke El‐Gabbas, Ahmed 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mms.12943 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mms.12943 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/mms.12943 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Marine Mammal Science volume 38, issue 4, page 1583-1608 ISSN 0824-0469 1748-7692 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12943 2024-06-06T04:20:17Z Abstract Understanding cetacean distribution is essential for conservation planning and decision‐making, particularly in regions subject to rapid environmental changes. Nevertheless, information on their spatiotemporal distribution is commonly limited, especially from remote areas. Species distribution models (SDMs) are powerful tools, relating species occurrences to environmental variables to predict the species' potential distribution. This study aims at using presence‐only SDMs (MaxEnt) to identify suitable habitats for fin whales ( Balaenoptera physalus ) on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds. We used spatial‐block cross‐validation to tune MaxEnt parameters and evaluate model performance using spatially independent testing data. We considered spatial sampling bias correction using four methods. Important environmental variables were distance to shore and sea ice edge, variability of sea surface temperature and sea surface salinity, and depth. Suitable fin whale habitats were predicted along the west coast of Svalbard, between Svalbard and the eastern Norwegian Sea, coastal areas off Iceland and southern East Greenland, and along the Knipovich Ridge to Jan Mayen. Results support that presence‐only SDMs are effective tools to predict cetacean habitat suitability, particularly in remote areas like the Arctic Ocean. SDMs constitute a cost‐effective method for targeting future surveys and identifying top priority sites for conservation measures. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Balaenoptera physalus East Greenland Fin whale Greenland Iceland Jan Mayen Norwegian Sea Sea ice Svalbard Wiley Online Library Arctic Arctic Ocean Greenland Jan Mayen Knipovich Ridge ENVELOPE(7.074,7.074,75.712,75.712) Norwegian Sea Svalbard Svalbard ENVELOPE(20.000,20.000,78.000,78.000) Marine Mammal Science
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Understanding cetacean distribution is essential for conservation planning and decision‐making, particularly in regions subject to rapid environmental changes. Nevertheless, information on their spatiotemporal distribution is commonly limited, especially from remote areas. Species distribution models (SDMs) are powerful tools, relating species occurrences to environmental variables to predict the species' potential distribution. This study aims at using presence‐only SDMs (MaxEnt) to identify suitable habitats for fin whales ( Balaenoptera physalus ) on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds. We used spatial‐block cross‐validation to tune MaxEnt parameters and evaluate model performance using spatially independent testing data. We considered spatial sampling bias correction using four methods. Important environmental variables were distance to shore and sea ice edge, variability of sea surface temperature and sea surface salinity, and depth. Suitable fin whale habitats were predicted along the west coast of Svalbard, between Svalbard and the eastern Norwegian Sea, coastal areas off Iceland and southern East Greenland, and along the Knipovich Ridge to Jan Mayen. Results support that presence‐only SDMs are effective tools to predict cetacean habitat suitability, particularly in remote areas like the Arctic Ocean. SDMs constitute a cost‐effective method for targeting future surveys and identifying top priority sites for conservation measures.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Duengen, Diandra
Burkhardt, Elke
El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
spellingShingle Duengen, Diandra
Burkhardt, Elke
El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds
author_facet Duengen, Diandra
Burkhardt, Elke
El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
author_sort Duengen, Diandra
title Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds
title_short Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds
title_full Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds
title_fullStr Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds
title_full_unstemmed Fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their Nordic and Barents Seas feeding grounds
title_sort fin whale ( balaenoptera physalus) distribution modeling on their nordic and barents seas feeding grounds
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mms.12943
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mms.12943
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/mms.12943
long_lat ENVELOPE(7.074,7.074,75.712,75.712)
ENVELOPE(20.000,20.000,78.000,78.000)
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Greenland
Jan Mayen
Knipovich Ridge
Norwegian Sea
Svalbard
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Greenland
Jan Mayen
Knipovich Ridge
Norwegian Sea
Svalbard
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Balaenoptera physalus
East Greenland
Fin whale
Greenland
Iceland
Jan Mayen
Norwegian Sea
Sea ice
Svalbard
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Balaenoptera physalus
East Greenland
Fin whale
Greenland
Iceland
Jan Mayen
Norwegian Sea
Sea ice
Svalbard
op_source Marine Mammal Science
volume 38, issue 4, page 1583-1608
ISSN 0824-0469 1748-7692
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12943
container_title Marine Mammal Science
_version_ 1802641454464499712