Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment

Abstract In terrestrial ecosystems, plant species and diverse root‐associated fungi form complex networks of host–symbiont associations. Recent studies have revealed that structures of those below‐ground plant–fungus networks differ between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal symbioses. Nonet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular Ecology
Main Authors: Toju, H., Tanabe, A. S., Ishii, H. S.
Other Authors: JSPS KAKENHI, Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers of Cabinet Office, the Government of Japan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13680
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fmec.13680
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mec.13680
id crwiley:10.1111/mec.13680
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/mec.13680 2024-09-15T18:39:48+00:00 Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment Toju, H. Tanabe, A. S. Ishii, H. S. JSPS KAKENHI Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers of Cabinet Office, the Government of Japan 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13680 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fmec.13680 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mec.13680 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 Molecular Ecology volume 25, issue 13, page 3242-3257 ISSN 0962-1083 1365-294X journal-article 2016 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13680 2024-08-20T04:12:41Z Abstract In terrestrial ecosystems, plant species and diverse root‐associated fungi form complex networks of host–symbiont associations. Recent studies have revealed that structures of those below‐ground plant–fungus networks differ between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal symbioses. Nonetheless, we still remain ignorant of how ericaceous plant species, which dominate arctic and alpine tundra, constitute networks with their root‐associated fungi. Based on a high‐throughput DNA sequencing data set, we characterized the statistical properties of a network involving 16 ericaceous plant species and more than 500 fungal taxa in the alpine–subalpine region of Mt. Tateyama, central Japan. While all the 16 ericaceous species were associated mainly with fungi in the order Helotiales, they varied remarkably in association with fungi in other orders such as Sebacinales, Atheliales, Agaricales, Russulales and Thelephorales. The ericaceous plant–fungus network was characterized by high symbiont/host preferences. Moreover, the network had a characteristic structure called ‘anti‐nestedness’, which has been previously reported in ectomycorrhizal plant–fungus networks. The results lead to the hypothesis that ericaceous plants in harsh environments can host unexpectedly diverse root‐associated fungal taxa, constituting networks whose structures are similar to those of previously reported ectomycorrhizal networks but not to those of arbuscular mycorrhizal ones. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tundra Wiley Online Library Molecular Ecology 25 13 3242 3257
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract In terrestrial ecosystems, plant species and diverse root‐associated fungi form complex networks of host–symbiont associations. Recent studies have revealed that structures of those below‐ground plant–fungus networks differ between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal symbioses. Nonetheless, we still remain ignorant of how ericaceous plant species, which dominate arctic and alpine tundra, constitute networks with their root‐associated fungi. Based on a high‐throughput DNA sequencing data set, we characterized the statistical properties of a network involving 16 ericaceous plant species and more than 500 fungal taxa in the alpine–subalpine region of Mt. Tateyama, central Japan. While all the 16 ericaceous species were associated mainly with fungi in the order Helotiales, they varied remarkably in association with fungi in other orders such as Sebacinales, Atheliales, Agaricales, Russulales and Thelephorales. The ericaceous plant–fungus network was characterized by high symbiont/host preferences. Moreover, the network had a characteristic structure called ‘anti‐nestedness’, which has been previously reported in ectomycorrhizal plant–fungus networks. The results lead to the hypothesis that ericaceous plants in harsh environments can host unexpectedly diverse root‐associated fungal taxa, constituting networks whose structures are similar to those of previously reported ectomycorrhizal networks but not to those of arbuscular mycorrhizal ones.
author2 JSPS KAKENHI
Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers of Cabinet Office, the Government of Japan
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Toju, H.
Tanabe, A. S.
Ishii, H. S.
spellingShingle Toju, H.
Tanabe, A. S.
Ishii, H. S.
Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment
author_facet Toju, H.
Tanabe, A. S.
Ishii, H. S.
author_sort Toju, H.
title Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment
title_short Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment
title_full Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment
title_fullStr Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment
title_full_unstemmed Ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment
title_sort ericaceous plant–fungus network in a harsh alpine–subalpine environment
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13680
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fmec.13680
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mec.13680
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_source Molecular Ecology
volume 25, issue 13, page 3242-3257
ISSN 0962-1083 1365-294X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13680
container_title Molecular Ecology
container_volume 25
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3242
op_container_end_page 3257
_version_ 1810484149751906304