The relative role of climate and herbivory in driving treeline dynamics along a latitudinal gradient

• Published in: Journal of Vegetation Science
• Main Authors: Mienna, Ida Marielle, Speed, James David Mervyn, Klanderud, Kari, Austrheim, Gunnar, Næsset, Erik, Bollandsås, Ole Martin
• Other Authors: Wildi, Otto, Norges Forskningsråd
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: Tundra
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12865; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fjvs.12865; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jvs.12865; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/jvs.12865

Abstract Aim The treeline is an obvious ecotone between forest and tundra ecosystems. Climatic warming is expected to lead to the treeline advancing, although in many cases this has not been observed. This is most likely because other factors can also influence treeline dynamics, notably land use and herbivory in European treelines. In this study, the roles of climate and herbivory as determinants for change in stem number, growth and mortality responses of treeline ecotone trees were investigated. Location Thirty‐six sites along a 1,000 km latitudinal gradient in the Scandes Mountains in Norway (60–69° N). Methods We recorded changes in stem numbers and height, and mortality between 2008 and 2012. A partial least‐squares regression analysis (PLS) was carried out to find the relative importance of groups of variables representing climate, herbivory, site and tree properties for explaining the variation in these three response variables. We also fitted general additive models for each response with selected variables from the PLS analysis. Results We found an increase in number of stems and tree height for short and medium tall trees. The climatic variables explained the greatest proportion of the variation of the change in stem numbers, while tree height growth and mortality were best predicted by the growth stage of the tree and climate. Conclusions Our study shows that climate explains more of the variance in treeline performance than herbivory, tree properties or latitude. Relatively weak explanatory power of all variables suggests high context dependency of treeline dynamics between sites. It seems that at large scales, variables known to be important in regulating treeline dynamics within sites are poor predictors of treeline change in the short term.