How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor

Summary The objective of this study was to compare to each other the methods currently recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine ( AASM ) to measure snoring: an acoustic sensor, a piezoelectric sensor and a nasal pressure transducer (cannula). Ten subjects reporting habitual snoring were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Sleep Research
Main Authors: Arnardottir, Erna S., Isleifsson, Bardur, Agustsson, Jon S., Sigurdsson, Gunnar A., Sigurgunnarsdottir, Magdalena O., Sigurđarson, Gudjon T., Saevarsson, Gudmundur, Sveinbjarnarson, Atli T., Hoskuldsson, Sveinbjorn, Gislason, Thorarinn
Other Authors: ResMed Foundation
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12356
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fjsr.12356
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jsr.12356
id crwiley:10.1111/jsr.12356
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/jsr.12356 2024-06-23T07:54:03+00:00 How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor Arnardottir, Erna S. Isleifsson, Bardur Agustsson, Jon S. Sigurdsson, Gunnar A. Sigurgunnarsdottir, Magdalena O. Sigurđarson, Gudjon T. Saevarsson, Gudmundur Sveinbjarnarson, Atli T. Hoskuldsson, Sveinbjorn Gislason, Thorarinn ResMed Foundation 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12356 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fjsr.12356 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jsr.12356 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Sleep Research volume 25, issue 2, page 158-168 ISSN 0962-1105 1365-2869 journal-article 2015 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12356 2024-06-04T06:39:38Z Summary The objective of this study was to compare to each other the methods currently recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine ( AASM ) to measure snoring: an acoustic sensor, a piezoelectric sensor and a nasal pressure transducer (cannula). Ten subjects reporting habitual snoring were included in the study, performed at Landspitali—University Hospital, Iceland. Snoring was assessed by listening to the air medium microphone located on a patient's chest, compared to listening to two overhead air medium microphones (stereo) and manual scoring of a piezoelectric sensor and nasal cannula vibrations. The chest audio picked up the highest number of snore events of the different snore sensors. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of scoring snore events from the different sensors was compared to the chest audio: overhead audio (0.78, 0.98), cannula (0.55, 0.67) and piezoelectric sensor (0.78, 0.92), respectively. The chest audio was capable of detecting snore events with lower volume and higher fundamental frequency than the other sensors. The 200 Hz sampling rate of the cannula and piezoelectric sensor was one of their limitations for detecting snore events. The different snore sensors do not measure snore events in the same manner. This lack of consistency will affect future research on the clinical significance of snoring. Standardization of objective snore measurements is therefore needed. Based on this paper, snore measurements should be audio‐based and the use of the cannula as a snore sensor be discontinued, but the piezoelectric sensor could possibly be modified for improvement. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Wiley Online Library Journal of Sleep Research 25 2 158 168
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Summary The objective of this study was to compare to each other the methods currently recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine ( AASM ) to measure snoring: an acoustic sensor, a piezoelectric sensor and a nasal pressure transducer (cannula). Ten subjects reporting habitual snoring were included in the study, performed at Landspitali—University Hospital, Iceland. Snoring was assessed by listening to the air medium microphone located on a patient's chest, compared to listening to two overhead air medium microphones (stereo) and manual scoring of a piezoelectric sensor and nasal cannula vibrations. The chest audio picked up the highest number of snore events of the different snore sensors. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of scoring snore events from the different sensors was compared to the chest audio: overhead audio (0.78, 0.98), cannula (0.55, 0.67) and piezoelectric sensor (0.78, 0.92), respectively. The chest audio was capable of detecting snore events with lower volume and higher fundamental frequency than the other sensors. The 200 Hz sampling rate of the cannula and piezoelectric sensor was one of their limitations for detecting snore events. The different snore sensors do not measure snore events in the same manner. This lack of consistency will affect future research on the clinical significance of snoring. Standardization of objective snore measurements is therefore needed. Based on this paper, snore measurements should be audio‐based and the use of the cannula as a snore sensor be discontinued, but the piezoelectric sensor could possibly be modified for improvement.
author2 ResMed Foundation
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Arnardottir, Erna S.
Isleifsson, Bardur
Agustsson, Jon S.
Sigurdsson, Gunnar A.
Sigurgunnarsdottir, Magdalena O.
Sigurđarson, Gudjon T.
Saevarsson, Gudmundur
Sveinbjarnarson, Atli T.
Hoskuldsson, Sveinbjorn
Gislason, Thorarinn
spellingShingle Arnardottir, Erna S.
Isleifsson, Bardur
Agustsson, Jon S.
Sigurdsson, Gunnar A.
Sigurgunnarsdottir, Magdalena O.
Sigurđarson, Gudjon T.
Saevarsson, Gudmundur
Sveinbjarnarson, Atli T.
Hoskuldsson, Sveinbjorn
Gislason, Thorarinn
How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor
author_facet Arnardottir, Erna S.
Isleifsson, Bardur
Agustsson, Jon S.
Sigurdsson, Gunnar A.
Sigurgunnarsdottir, Magdalena O.
Sigurđarson, Gudjon T.
Saevarsson, Gudmundur
Sveinbjarnarson, Atli T.
Hoskuldsson, Sveinbjorn
Gislason, Thorarinn
author_sort Arnardottir, Erna S.
title How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor
title_short How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor
title_full How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor
title_fullStr How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor
title_full_unstemmed How to measure snoring? A comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor
title_sort how to measure snoring? a comparison of the microphone, cannula and piezoelectric sensor
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12356
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fjsr.12356
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jsr.12356
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Journal of Sleep Research
volume 25, issue 2, page 158-168
ISSN 0962-1105 1365-2869
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12356
container_title Journal of Sleep Research
container_volume 25
container_issue 2
container_start_page 158
op_container_end_page 168
_version_ 1802646007071113216