A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts
Abstract An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod‐caught fish captured using a sensitive angling technique. No significant...
Published in: | Journal of Fish Biology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jfb.15134 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/jfb.15134 |
id |
crwiley:10.1111/jfb.15134 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1111/jfb.15134 2024-09-15T18:33:01+00:00 A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle Del Villar‐Guerra, Diego Department of Agriculture, Australian Government 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jfb.15134 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/jfb.15134 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Fish Biology volume 101, issue 3, page 745-748 ISSN 0022-1112 1095-8649 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 2024-08-22T04:17:07Z Abstract An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod‐caught fish captured using a sensitive angling technique. No significant difference was evident in survival with 83% of both samples detected in the river outflow, 67% of the trap and 76% of the rod samples were detected in coastal waters and finally 43% of the trap and 35% of the rod samples were detected on an offshore array c. 50 km from the river outlet. No significant difference was evident in the time taken for trap‐ and rod‐sampled fish to reach either the river outflow, coastal or offshore waters. Angling, if undertaken sensitively, can provide an effective, resource‐efficient and ethically justifiable sampling tool for juvenile salmonid age classes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Salmo salar Wiley Online Library Journal of Fish Biology 101 3 745 748 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
description |
Abstract An experiment was undertaken, using acoustic telemetry, to compare the survival and migratory timing of Salmo salar L. smolts sampled, under optimal conditions, in a traditional fixed Wolf trap against a sample of rod‐caught fish captured using a sensitive angling technique. No significant difference was evident in survival with 83% of both samples detected in the river outflow, 67% of the trap and 76% of the rod samples were detected in coastal waters and finally 43% of the trap and 35% of the rod samples were detected on an offshore array c. 50 km from the river outlet. No significant difference was evident in the time taken for trap‐ and rod‐sampled fish to reach either the river outflow, coastal or offshore waters. Angling, if undertaken sensitively, can provide an effective, resource‐efficient and ethically justifiable sampling tool for juvenile salmonid age classes. |
author2 |
Department of Agriculture, Australian Government |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle Del Villar‐Guerra, Diego |
spellingShingle |
Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle Del Villar‐Guerra, Diego A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts |
author_facet |
Kennedy, Richard Rosell, Robert Campbell, Warren Allen, Michelle Del Villar‐Guerra, Diego |
author_sort |
Kennedy, Richard |
title |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts |
title_short |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts |
title_full |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled Salmo salar smolts |
title_sort |
comparison of the behaviour and survival of angling vs. trap‐sampled salmo salar smolts |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jfb.15134 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/jfb.15134 |
genre |
Salmo salar |
genre_facet |
Salmo salar |
op_source |
Journal of Fish Biology volume 101, issue 3, page 745-748 ISSN 0022-1112 1095-8649 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15134 |
container_title |
Journal of Fish Biology |
container_volume |
101 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
745 |
op_container_end_page |
748 |
_version_ |
1810474781336666112 |