Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality

Abstract Background Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is a new technology that could motivate learners, but also could contain distracting elements that increase cognitive demands on learners. In contrast, learning with conventional media, such as a narrated slideshow could be less motivating, but als...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Main Authors: Lawson, Alyssa P., Mayer, Richard E.
Other Authors: Office of Naval Research
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12925
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcal.12925
id crwiley:10.1111/jcal.12925
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/jcal.12925 2024-06-09T07:48:48+00:00 Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality Lawson, Alyssa P. Mayer, Richard E. Office of Naval Research 2024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12925 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcal.12925 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning volume 40, issue 3, page 1068-1082 ISSN 0266-4909 1365-2729 journal-article 2024 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12925 2024-05-16T14:26:20Z Abstract Background Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is a new technology that could motivate learners, but also could contain distracting elements that increase cognitive demands on learners. In contrast, learning with conventional media, such as a narrated slideshow could be less motivating, but also less distracting. Objectives This experiment investigates: (1) in what situations executive function and working memory capacity play a role in learning in IVR and a slideshow lesson and (2) whether people learn science content better with IVR or with a narrated slideshow lesson. Method Participants watched a lesson on ocean acidification either using a head‐mounted display IVR device or a pre‐recorded narrated slideshow lesson. A week later, they took a test on this material and completed tasks to assess executive function and working memory capacity. Results and Conclusion On a post‐test, there was no difference between IVR and slideshow lessons, but there were differences in the role of executive function in learning with these two media. For students learning in IVR, executive function correlated significantly with post‐test scores, such that learners with stronger executive function did better on the posttest than those with weaker executive function, while for students learning with a slideshow lesson, executive function and working memory capacity did not correlate significantly with posttest scores. This research indicates that it is important to understand how a learner's attentional controls impact their understanding when using IVR for learning. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Wiley Online Library Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 40 3 1068 1082
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Background Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is a new technology that could motivate learners, but also could contain distracting elements that increase cognitive demands on learners. In contrast, learning with conventional media, such as a narrated slideshow could be less motivating, but also less distracting. Objectives This experiment investigates: (1) in what situations executive function and working memory capacity play a role in learning in IVR and a slideshow lesson and (2) whether people learn science content better with IVR or with a narrated slideshow lesson. Method Participants watched a lesson on ocean acidification either using a head‐mounted display IVR device or a pre‐recorded narrated slideshow lesson. A week later, they took a test on this material and completed tasks to assess executive function and working memory capacity. Results and Conclusion On a post‐test, there was no difference between IVR and slideshow lessons, but there were differences in the role of executive function in learning with these two media. For students learning in IVR, executive function correlated significantly with post‐test scores, such that learners with stronger executive function did better on the posttest than those with weaker executive function, while for students learning with a slideshow lesson, executive function and working memory capacity did not correlate significantly with posttest scores. This research indicates that it is important to understand how a learner's attentional controls impact their understanding when using IVR for learning.
author2 Office of Naval Research
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lawson, Alyssa P.
Mayer, Richard E.
spellingShingle Lawson, Alyssa P.
Mayer, Richard E.
Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality
author_facet Lawson, Alyssa P.
Mayer, Richard E.
author_sort Lawson, Alyssa P.
title Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality
title_short Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality
title_full Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality
title_fullStr Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality
title_sort individual differences in executive function affect learning with immersive virtual reality
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2024
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12925
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcal.12925
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_source Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
volume 40, issue 3, page 1068-1082
ISSN 0266-4909 1365-2729
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12925
container_title Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
container_volume 40
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1068
op_container_end_page 1082
_version_ 1801380696210538496