Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size

Avian eggs exhibit substantial intra‐ and interspecific variation in shape, size and colour. Considerable efforts have been made to better understand the evolutionary drivers behind such variation, often using museum egg collections. Usually it is assumed that museum collections accurately represent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Avian Biology
Main Authors: Thompson, Jamie E., Birkhead, Tim R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jav.02507
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fjav.02507
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jav.02507
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/jav.02507
id crwiley:10.1111/jav.02507
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/jav.02507 2024-03-31T07:47:55+00:00 Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size Thompson, Jamie E. Birkhead, Tim R. 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jav.02507 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fjav.02507 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jav.02507 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/jav.02507 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Journal of Avian Biology volume 51, issue 8 ISSN 0908-8857 1600-048X Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2020 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02507 2024-03-05T05:45:51Z Avian eggs exhibit substantial intra‐ and interspecific variation in shape, size and colour. Considerable efforts have been made to better understand the evolutionary drivers behind such variation, often using museum egg collections. Usually it is assumed that museum collections accurately represent the variation seen in natural populations, but this may not be the case if there is collection bias. Collection bias may lead to the over‐representation of certain egg traits in collections, due to the aesthetic (or other) preferences of collectors. The aim of this study is to begin to look for the occurrence of potential collection bias in museum egg collections by comparing three shape indices (pointedness/asymmetry, elongation and polar asymmetry) and egg volume between subsets of eggs in museum collections with those of recently sampled eggs in the field for three different bird species: common guillemot Uria aalge , razorbill Alca torda and northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis . We found no evidence of collection bias in our sampled razorbill and northern fulmar museum collection eggs, but some evidence for a bias in sampled museum collection eggs of common guillemots. Since the guillemot's egg differs from most bird eggs in being pyriform, we suggest that collection bias by historic egg collectors may be more prevalent in species with extreme egg traits. Researchers using museum egg collections to examine questions relating to egg shape should be aware of collection bias risks and consider how to minimise the effect of these possible biases on accumulated datasets. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alca torda common guillemot Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar Razorbill Uria aalge uria Wiley Online Library Fulmar ENVELOPE(-46.016,-46.016,-60.616,-60.616) Journal of Avian Biology 51 8
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Thompson, Jamie E.
Birkhead, Tim R.
Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Avian eggs exhibit substantial intra‐ and interspecific variation in shape, size and colour. Considerable efforts have been made to better understand the evolutionary drivers behind such variation, often using museum egg collections. Usually it is assumed that museum collections accurately represent the variation seen in natural populations, but this may not be the case if there is collection bias. Collection bias may lead to the over‐representation of certain egg traits in collections, due to the aesthetic (or other) preferences of collectors. The aim of this study is to begin to look for the occurrence of potential collection bias in museum egg collections by comparing three shape indices (pointedness/asymmetry, elongation and polar asymmetry) and egg volume between subsets of eggs in museum collections with those of recently sampled eggs in the field for three different bird species: common guillemot Uria aalge , razorbill Alca torda and northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis . We found no evidence of collection bias in our sampled razorbill and northern fulmar museum collection eggs, but some evidence for a bias in sampled museum collection eggs of common guillemots. Since the guillemot's egg differs from most bird eggs in being pyriform, we suggest that collection bias by historic egg collectors may be more prevalent in species with extreme egg traits. Researchers using museum egg collections to examine questions relating to egg shape should be aware of collection bias risks and consider how to minimise the effect of these possible biases on accumulated datasets.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Thompson, Jamie E.
Birkhead, Tim R.
author_facet Thompson, Jamie E.
Birkhead, Tim R.
author_sort Thompson, Jamie E.
title Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size
title_short Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size
title_full Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size
title_fullStr Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size
title_full_unstemmed Avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size
title_sort avian egg collections: museum collection bias driven by shape and size
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jav.02507
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fjav.02507
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jav.02507
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/jav.02507
long_lat ENVELOPE(-46.016,-46.016,-60.616,-60.616)
geographic Fulmar
geographic_facet Fulmar
genre Alca torda
common guillemot
Fulmarus glacialis
Northern Fulmar
Razorbill
Uria aalge
uria
genre_facet Alca torda
common guillemot
Fulmarus glacialis
Northern Fulmar
Razorbill
Uria aalge
uria
op_source Journal of Avian Biology
volume 51, issue 8
ISSN 0908-8857 1600-048X
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02507
container_title Journal of Avian Biology
container_volume 51
container_issue 8
_version_ 1795038304409747456