The Haughton Impact Structure: Summary and Synthesis of the Results of the HISS Project*
Abstract— Surface and subsurface structural studies undertaken under the Haughton impact structure study (HISS) project indicate that the 23 Ma‐old Haughton impact structure, (Devon Island, Canadian Arctic) consists of a central basin of uplifted strata, an inner zone of uplifted megablocks at 3.5–5...
Published in: | Meteoritics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
1988
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01288.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1945-5100.1988.tb01288.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01288.x |
Summary: | Abstract— Surface and subsurface structural studies undertaken under the Haughton impact structure study (HISS) project indicate that the 23 Ma‐old Haughton impact structure, (Devon Island, Canadian Arctic) consists of a central basin of uplifted strata, an inner zone of uplifted megablocks at 3.5–5.5 km radius, a complex, faulted annulus of megablocks at 5.5–7.0 km radius and an outer zone of downfaulted blocks. No evidence of a previously suggested structural multi‐ring form was found. The geophysical studies suggest an original diameter of 24 km, slightly larger than previous estimates and the seismic data indicate considerably more faulting in the western portion than has been mapped from surface exposures. Detailed studies of the allochthonous breccia deposits found no major radial variations in lithology and shock levels. The only anomaly is the concentration of highly shocked, cobble‐sized clasts in the central area coincident with the maximum gravity and magnetic anomalies. It is suggested that this local component is related to the highly shocked rocks of the central uplift and may have been shed from the uplift during late stage adjustments. There is no visible central topographic peak of uplifted bedrock at Haughton but studies of the post‐impact Haughton Formation suggest that the center of the structure subsided 300–350 m soon after formation. Breccia studies also indicate the occurrence of shock‐melted sediments, including shales, but no evidence of shock melted carbonates, the most common target lithology. This may be ascribed to the ease with which carbonates are volatilized by relatively moderate shock levels. The large amount of volatiles released on impact helped disperse the highly shocked products leading to the formation of a relatively cool clastic and polymict breccia deposit in the interior, as opposed to a coherent melt sheet. In this regard, the breccia deposit is somewhat analogous to the suevite deposits within the Ries crater. Sedimentological studies indicate that the ... |
---|